by CAA | Jul 12, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues
Our article on One Up patrols certainly drew some attention across the spectrum of social media.
There was substantial division across the comments made, with a strong tendency for comments to come out in favour of the concept of one-up patrols, particularly for highway duties. And those comments came from current and former members who actually worked in this space.
The critics in the ‘no way’ camp, unfortunately, missed an important point. Not only that, I suspect that some of the comments were from people purporting to be Police with little idea of Policing realities.
The Chief Commissioner was not advocating a blanket one-up rule but putting forward a sensible Opt-in proposal.
In other words, contrary to what some have said, the plan is not to compel unwilling members to work one-up.
What is worrying is that some comments, either in the social media or wider media arena, have been emphatic ‘no’. It seems that those commentators didn’t read the fine print either.
We suspect there is a very strong reasoning behind the Chiefs’ view, and it is not a lot to do with increasing risks to members, but the reverse.
Moreover, the office of Police Constable, which all members voluntarily sign up for, comes with certain powers.
A significant power is the ability to exercise discretion in performing their duties, and here we have a number of critics paradoxically claiming that Police should not have the power to exercise discretion in relation to their own safety.
The power of safety should transcend all others.
The power to walk away from a confrontation is the single best defence a member can exercise; however, this is unlikely with the peer pressure of other Police present.
There was plenty of criticism aimed at the retired members by the critics who fail to understand that while many retired members did serve in a different era, just as many served in recent times, and all acknowledge that the current environment for policing is inherently more dangerous, but the police of today have advanced technology and numerically more support specialists than their forbears ever would have dreamt about.
Many retired police officers were equipped with a small rubber baton, a set of handcuffs, and occasionally a .32 mm Browning pistol or an even older .32 Colt pistol (most stations only had a few of these weapons, certainly not enough to arm the Station patrols fully). They were so obsolete, rumour has it, you could hear the bullet rattling down the barrel before falling at your feet. If the thing fired at all, the chances of hitting the intended target from more than 1-2 meters were remote. The weapon failure was generally down to ammunition that had been around for decades. Notably, this was also pre-ballistic vests for members.
I remember having a conversation with the former Chief Commissioner Mick Miller, who was waxing lyrical about the introduction of Police Utility belts, when he said,
“My gravest fear is that with the utility belt and all the Police paraphernalia hanging from it, it will cause members to push the belt through the door to solve a problem instead of using their brains”.
Although the current issue predominantly refers to Highway Patrol, the broader application exists where the approach to Patrol duties needs review.
-
- Foot patrols- it is inherently unsafe for members patrolling two up to walk side by side conducting their patrol.
They are often too easily engaged with their partner rather than the public, and their ‘situational awareness’ is severely compromised.
Two up or any multiple of Police on the beat should be spread out on either side of the street where practicable or at reasonable intervals.
This not only projects a wider Police presence but also preserves members’ safety and the effectiveness of their patrol.
-
- Local Mobile Patrols – It is common for Stations that field a Divisional Van on the 24-hr rotation to be two-up, and that is sound; however, the additional resources that a Station can apply to their community can be substantially multiplied by general duty patrols being one-up.
How that can work safely is that each member of a local mobile patrol has their own vehicle. The Supervising Sergeant works one up, and the normal Supervisor’s driver could man yet another car, putting four cars patrolling and one supervising, 5, instead of just 3, increasing the visible Police presence substantially.
That means when a job is allocated, the capacity of 5 cars can attend. It adds substantial weight to the Police presence, reducing the likelihood of violence towards the police or the community.
It is not a matter of members attending dangerous situations on their own, but they are backed up by multiple members and units.
Moreover, the Supervisor can detail one of the single-member patrols to deal with reports at the scene when any danger has passed, and relieve the other vehicles, improving the capacity of the Force to respond to demand.
To make this work, the supervisor’s role and capacity to manage resources are paramount.
A new protocol needs to be explored in which jobs are assigned to the Sergeant for distribution to their units. Decision-making at the lowest operational level possible.
If this approach were extrapolated across every station, that would translate into literally hundreds more police cars projecting the deterrent effect of a highly visible police presence on crime and other anti-social behaviour.
Car manufacturers would jump with glee at the prospect of providing VicPol with hundreds more vehicles.
On a pragmatic note, providing two to three additional vehicles to a Station would be cheaper than recruiting additional police and more effective.
Cars generally don’t take sickies, come late to work or get bogged down with paperwork.
The issue of Patrol efficacy has not been addressed for some time and follows a pattern that has changed little over 50 years. A review and update are well overdue, if for no other reason than to improve members’ safety.
Author Ivan Ray- on behalf of the CAA..He is Co-founder and Deputy Chair/CEO of the CAA, a former Police Inspector with 32 years of service in Metro Uniform, Traffic Metro and Highway, Patrol, Crime Cars, and CIB. Former Editor of Police Life and long-serving Public Relations Officer of VicPol. Founder and Life Member of the Blue Light Disco movement, and completed his Police career as an Inspector after 6 years as a Patrol Officer. He then moved into the private sector, running his own Business for 20 years until retirement.

DONATE
by CAA | Jul 10, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues
All Police work can be dangerous; every police member knows that, and denial would be inane. However, the risk must be considered in a historical context, and the murder of Police in Victoria is historically low.
We categorically believe that any death of a Police member is one death too many, but we need to deal with the reality. Unfortunately, the Police Honour Roll is very short on detail, and we have to rely on estimates to determine the actual impact on Police members.
What we can say for certain is that since 1853, there have only been 178 members who are recorded as losing their lives in the line of duty during those 173 years, and of those, there is a relatively small number who have died at the hands of a Felon. Best estimates have the number in the lower tens, rather than the hundreds. Motor vehicle crashes were the largest contributor to Police deaths.
When it comes to Police on one-up patrols resulting in a member’s death, we could only identify 1 since 2000; therefore, most deaths have occurred when multiple members are involved in an incident.
17 Victoria Police members have been added to the Honour Roll for line-of-duty deaths from 2000 to 2025; of those, only 7 involved deliberate criminal acts.
So that tells us where the danger lies, and it is not in one-up patrols.
Having worked in traffic for a period during my career, I spent time in Metro Melbourne, predominantly two-up and occasionally one-up, without issue. I then spent time on the Hume Highway working out of Seymour, always one up. The closest police assistance was often 30 minutes or more away.
As an example, I was working the Goulbourn Valley Highway near Murchison East one-up when a call came through from Shepparton reporting two offenders leaving a scene with stolen property in two separate stolen cars, heading for Seymour along the Goulbourn Valley Highway.
I parked the Police car out of sight and waited.
Sure enough, the first car described went past, and the second car came past some five minutes later.
I advised Seymour by radio, took off, intercepted the second car, handcuffed the perpetrator without conversation to the steering wheel through the quarter vent, and took off after the first car.
I intercepted the first car quite a few kilometres down the road near Nagambie. I was able to convince him to comply while we waited for the Seymour Van, which took nearly 30 minutes to reach me.
With that crook secured, I retrieved the second one and my handcuffs.
It wasn’t until both crooks were safely in the Seymour Station that the crook in the first car admitted that, when I pulled him up, he had been waiting for the second car to arrive, hoping that the two of them would then effect an escape at my expense.
That I didn’t tell the crook in the first car I had already secured his mate saved my bacon; experience tells.
Later in my career, I worked one-up as a Patrol Officer in Melbourne, a circumstance I preferred, as working two-up always, in my view, increased the risk of getting distracted.
The key to working safely as a Police member is not the number of colleagues you have around you, but your own survival skills, and that is predominantly ‘Situational Awareness.’
There used to be a strong emphasis on this skill at all levels of training, as it is an essential policing tool. Police graduates from training were assigned to Police Headquarters and were detailed for one-up foot patrols of the city. An invaluable learning experience for survival in a dangerous occupation.
Unfortunately, many of the basic Policing skills seem to have been lost.
Notably, we regularly see Police in the operational sphere in multiples, with their focus inward rather than on the environment they’re in, and that is dangerous, whether they are two-up or 10-up.
The more Police that are grouped together, the bigger the target.
It is clearly a lack of training and/or ineffective supervision that has been allowed to evolve in policing, making policing more dangerous.
When you look at the hard numbers and compare them to the vast increases in the population and an apparent ‘laissez-faire’ approach as to who enters the country, police deaths are remarkably and thankfully rare.
The voices opposing Chief Commissioner Mike Bush’s move to introduce one-up patrols are from the usual suspects trying to usurp the Chief Commissioner, as is the trend among naysayers and knockers. None of their criticism is based on empirical data.
Their bleating is more about trying to exercise power over him than about looking seriously at the issues in a pragmatic way, something they are highly unlikely to succeed in, as they continue to underestimate the man.
They are aggrieved that we have a Chief Commissioner who is a leader, not a head bobber.
The decision is neither brash nor reckless, and what a Coroner may have determined many years ago. According to available research, the coroner was scathing of the Police Command about leaving in service a faulty holster, susceptible to gun grab, when they were aware of the issue. The problem with the police-issued holster was its gun retention ability.
However, we were unable to find any reference in the public domain to the issue of one-up patrols in the Coroner’s findings.
The CAA encourages the Chief Commissioner to continue with this pilot scheme and acknowledges that not all Police members would be comfortable working alone, with nobody to talk to, let alone any safety aspect.
The opt-in of the one-up proposal recognises this and will allay any fears members may have.
With this opt-in rider, the Police Association doesn’t have a role to play in this matter; it is up to each member.
We encourage the Force to review its training and ensure that ‘Situational Awareness’ and other survival skills receive priority not only for frontline members but also in evaluating members for promotion to supervisory ranks, thereby saving police lives.
Author Ivan Ray- on behalf of the CAA..He is Co-founder and Deputy Chair/CEO of the CAA, a former Police Inspector with 32 years of service in Metro Uniform, Traffic Metro and Highway, Patrol, Crime Cars, and CIB. Former Editor of Police Life and long-serving Public Relations Officer of VicPol. Founder and Life Member of the Blue Light Disco movement, and completed his Police career as an Inspector after 6 years as a Patrol Officer. He then moved into the private sector, running his own Business for 20 years until retirement.

DONATE
by CAA | Jul 5, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
“But for the Grace of God go I, the mantra of the thousands of serving and former Police who are or were exposed to the worst possible and unimaginable trauma and are not diagnosed with PTSI.
But for the many current and future sufferers of this debilitating injury while performing their duty to the State, raises the question, ‘Are we looking after them for their service? We would argue – not very well.
Another question is, why do some serving and retired police officers not suffer any apparent mental injury, but others do?
As with all injuries, severity depends on multiple unquantifiable factors. Still, we would proffer that all serving and former Police do suffer from post-traumatic stress. But, like any other injury, the individual reacts in a multitude of ways and often not to a degree where they need medical intervention as they cope with the low or no impact from the injury.
We would also argue that the trauma experienced may well be the catalyst, but poor management practices escalate the impact, whereas competent management would mitigate its severity.
The problem with this injury is that outwardly it is not easily recognised, and victims, to all intents and purposes, are often living a normal life, but the truth is buried very deep, and what they live through can be manifestly cruel and unforgiving.
Although these injuries have long been recognised, the failure in leadership within the Force for sufferers has been woefully prevalent.
For some time now, a specific ward at Austin Health, Ward 17, has been dealing with the most severe cases in inadequate circumstances. Waiting times for admission to the highly specialised ward vary, but they should not exceed a reasonable benchmark.
Everyone who has had the need for this service has nothing but the highest praise for their treatment and the dedication of the Clinical and Support Staff of this unit.
Ward 17 is the only one of its type in the mental health public sector, with the only other like facility being part of St John of God Langmore Centre, a private health provider that also specialises in Military Veterans, Police and other Emergency Services for patients with acute PTSI. The difference is that Langmore Centre services Eastern Victoria, where Ward 17 serves the whole State.
The problem is, however, that those who should be supporting the Statewide public service and helping it to expand to cope with the increased demand going forward, to avoid waiting times from exploding, are sadly lacking.
Waiting to gain access to this service can be detrimental to the injured victims. The facility will not cope with additional patients as the size of the Force increases, causing an inevitable rise in demand on all PTSI support services.
While serious effort must be applied to reducing the severity of PTSI, the resources must be expanded to cope.
Expanding the Ward 17 facility, which is currently at capacity, is not a simple matter of adding a few extra beds, but a new wing needs to be added to accommodate the demand.
The Force, over the last decade, has treated the Ward as something that exists for which they have no responsibility, but the truth is the opposite: they have a responsibility to the members and to former members who need this specialist service.
The Force employed them, exposing them to the cause of their injury so their responsibility doesn’t end when their service ceases either morally or legally.
Moreover, the Force, it can be argued, has failed to provide mechanisms that identify the early onset of the Injury, and in doing so, injury mitigation does not occur, aggravating the failure of VicPol to take responsibility for the injury that can be argued they caused.
Like all organisations, there are varying degrees of competence of managers at all ranks that can contribute adversely or positively to the severity of the injury.
The Force had a policy derived from a review in 2018/19 of now questionable value; however, the architects of this review omitted a critical component. The ability to measure the effectiveness of policy changes.
There is a fundamental principle with all policy, and that is if you want to see the policy succeed, ensure that it is measured and measurable.
The Force has been historically capable in measuring Crime, the Road Toll and other operational functions; however, it has continually failed, particularly over the last decade, to even attempt to measure other critical organisational functions.
There is only one way to understand if an organisation is functioning well, and that is to measure the functional components diligently; otherwise, the executive is operating on the ‘Vibe’ of The Castle, esq.
The Policy we refer to, although not to flash, fell into the hole somewhere along the line, along with the other failed Policies, and that is a reflection on the Chief Commissioner of the time. The effort and time applied to the Policy was no more than a box-ticking exercise,
As a lot of the serious impacts of PTSI occur after the member has either been discharged or retired, it is grossly improper that the Force ignores responsibility for their demise. This problem is not so much the Force’s lack of willingness to help, but the loss of connection between the Force and retired members, something that must be addressed.
Not only is the Force guilty of malfeasance at times, but probably more so the Police Association.
Particularly former Police who suffer PTSI have paid their union dues for the duration of their career, but when they suffer, we are advised the Association does not want to know them, and that is a disgrace.
Policing is really an employment where there are takers and users, and the victims injured in this State are the losers.
Victoria Police currently has roughly 22,000 employees.- 17804 actual police. Applying the nationally cited 11% PTSI prevalence suggests that just under 2,000 current employees potentially experience PTSI symptoms at any given time. However, this is an estimate rather than an official Victoria Police figure, a figure the Force should reasonably be expected to be aware of.
At a time in the Forces’ history where demands on its services are heightened and very unlikely to abate, the issue of reducing PTSI must be a priority.
PTSI is the train barreling towards disaster.
Reducing the prevalence and severity of PTSI in the Force is an occupational health issue within policing, with non-negotiable responsibility for victims who are no longer serving.
A focused management of this issue has substantial cost benefits apart from the moral responsibilities. Reducing the severity of PTSI will directly impact the ability of the Force to perform its function.
There has been a tendency to see the ending of a Police member’s career due to PTSI as somewhat of a relief for Force management, but in reality, most discharges are a management failure. This management relief is a narrow and jaundiced view of reality, as the cost of replacing these trained members is excessively high.
The loss of these members and their experience, coupled with the time required to replace them, is inordinate.
This raises the issue of the importance of a Force Reserve where members can get some respite from the daily exposure to risk factors. A member’s career can be readjusted to minimise any PTSI issues.
The reintroduction of on-campus training, moving from the current model of online training, would be a huge benefit for members. The efficiency of stations and workplaces would improve, with members able to focus on their policing role without being distracted by training obligations or desires, and members would gain exposure to the wider Force, thereby improving Force culture.
Online training was introduced to improve the efficiency of training delivery, not its effectiveness.
Exposure to peers is the best self-evaluation tool available to any employee, and in Policing, this can only be achieved with on-campus training for the duration of a Police member’s career.
The break from the front line would prove invaluable to members’ long-term mental health, as would the ability of trainers to identify members who may be at risk and apply early intervention strategies.
The silent issue is the impact of the Force insurers on the welfare of PTSI sufferers in an adversarial relationship that can further damage the victim. Anecdotally, we have been told of actions by the Insurer where the injured member has been effectively sanctioned, and that must cease.
Telling PTSI sufferers that they can no longer work not only within the Force, but anywhere, is unconscionable and is a sanction for having the injury. This is particularly cruel given their injury impacts their character; they are effectively being told they are a lesser person; talk about being thrown onto the rubbish heap,
The CAA is exploring the feasibility of creating a forum where sufferers, clinicians, the Government, the Police Union, and the Force can come together with the Force Insurers to develop strategies to address the needs of the Police adequately and minimise the impact of work-related stress.
The objective is not only to benefit members and their families but to reduce the impact of PTSI on Force personnel resources.
Addressing this issue may avoid the inevitable class action against the Government, the Force and the Insurers for past failures.
There are many angry former Police out there…
The irony is that if the 2018-19 policy had been properly implemented, even that flawed version with proper corporate governance oversight achieved by measuring the effectiveness against regular reviews and accountability, many Police may not have succumbed to serious PSTI requiring medical intervention.
The major flaw was not implementing a mechanism to measure the efficacy of the proposed initiatives.
As with most corporate initiatives, if you don’t measure it, how can you determine its efficacy?
Therein lies a serious systemic failure within the Force.
Author Ivan Ray- on behalf of the CAA..He is Co-founder and Deputy Chair/CEO of the CAA, a former Police Inspector with 32 years of service in Metro Uniform, Traffic Metro and Highway, Patrol, Crime Cars, and CIB. Former Editor of Police Life and long-serving Public Relations Officer of VicPol. Founder and Life Member of the Blue Light Disco movement, and completed his Police career as an Inspector after 6 years as a Patrol Officer. He then moved into the private sector, running his own Business for 20 years until retirement.

DONATE
by CAA | Jun 14, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues
Ivan Ray
These new revelations in the Herald Sun of June 10 2026, under the headline
“’Shattered’: Data reveals Victorian areas with closed police stations also lost the most frontline officers.” is not big news to serving and former Police.
Fashionable activities like Task Forces and other special duties have been staffed at the expense of the Local Police Station.
What is often overlooked by Police management is that it may look good in the media that a task force or some other special unit has been created to deal with a particular criminal activity, but where are the staff drawn from to initiate the special unit – the Police stations, of course, where else?
There is an argument that the best and brightest are selected for these tasks, but this is talent and experience extracted from the Police Station, which can be very damaging to a Station and not only on the Roster.
These strategies damage, sometimes irreparably, the fabric and effectiveness of a Police Station. And members taken prematurely from Station rosters before they have gained essential experience will rarely evolve into useful leaders if they only know the Special Duty/Task Force genera of Policing. Good policing is more than just catching crooks.
Members overlooked for these positions, justifiably or not, can become despondent and lose their enthusiasm for policing. This can affect swathes of a Station’s staff adversely. A demoralised workforce, even if only a percentage, adversely impacts the overall performance and output of the infected unit and the most impacted is the community.
The visible Police presence (crime prevention) is continually eroded as any Police extracted from a station roster quickly adopt the dress-up look of the American Special Forces.
There is a concept decried by experienced police –we must build a Police force of specialists generalists, rather than a force of specialists, the trend of the last decade.
Not only will it build a more efficient Force, but job satisfaction will be elevated substantially.
By way of a practical example, we are aware of a Police response to an attempted car theft from a vehicle parked on the front lawn of a suburban residence.
Two Uniform Police vehicles attended, with one member speaking with the vehicle owner, taking the report, and the other three members standing in a group talking (with situational awareness, at zero, police at any scene are in the danger zone).
About 20 minutes after the first police car arrived, a Crime Scene vehicle turned up with another two members, a total of six for an attempted car theft during the previous night.
With the arrival of the Specialist Crime Unit, the group chatting increased by one, the member taking the initial report, and they all just watched as the Crime Scene crew fingerprinted and photographed the vehicle subject of the attempted theft and the crime scene crew then proceeded to do a door knock in the neighbourhood, not the other four police just hanging around.
Traditionally, one of those number would be responsible for investigating the crime, or in this new modern force, are all investigations just passed off.
If this is how modern policing is supposed to function, therein lies the key to the problems the Force faces.
The first of the two crews of General Duties should have been well capable of dealing with the crime scene and doorknocking, but they obviously do not see that as their role; it is a job for a specialist – that is absurd.

DONATE
The time and resources wasted were incredible, and all the while, if other people were waiting for a police response in the area, bad luck, and as for crime prevention patrol- forget it.
This is but one incident that highlights poor supervision and the need for the Police to become specialist generalists rather than report takers.
Add to that, how can it be useful for policing to have operational members dressed up out of uniform, wearing all the normal police paraphernalia? A Police-Issue ballistic vest (usually emblazoned with POLICE), a utility belt with the full range of equipment, O/C spray, including a firearm often strapped to their leg, wild-west-esque.
There can be no tactical or other advantage in this dressing down or dressing up to mimic American Special Forces (ASF) for members performing a police task. Excluding covert operations, this half-in, half-out approach must be reined in – it’s one Force. Police members must learn to be proud of their uniform, which portrays professionalism.
Anybody in the vicinity of, generally, a large station, around lunchtime, will regularly see police in this dress-up rig going to buy lunch wearing full kit.
We didn’t know buying lunch was so dangerous. Do you really need all your trinkets to get a chicken sandwich?
Competent Police win the respect of the community, wearing their uniform with pride, and it shows.
A previous Chief Commissioner told a CAA meeting once that new members these days break their necks to get into the uniform, and after 2-3 years, do everything they can to get out of it.
We assume he experienced severe headwinds trying to resolve the problem and failed.
Perhaps the uniform itself is less than fit for purpose; it looks scruffy on many police, but more likely, the junior members, barely out of probation, are seeking status or the supposed thrill associated with specialist work. If that’s their motivation, they will never make a good Police member, as we continue to remind the Force that there is more to policing than catching crooks; crime prevention is a greater priority, just ask the community.
When the free-for-all of taking staff from Police Stations grew dramatically under previous police administrations, those leaders forgot one imperative – all crooks and their families live in a Police Station area of responsibility, so it should therefore be no surprise that areas where police numbers have been decreased, the crime rate has grown proportionally as a direct result, just like night follows day.
Importantly, the number of Police at a station can be misleading with the allocation of Police to a Special Duties group, usually hidden under a number of aliases, District Support, DSG, etc. (A force Inspectorate would sort this in short order), while the position still remains on the Station Roster, it looks like there are more Police than there are. On paper only.
We are the first to acknowledge that there is a need for specialists to focus their efforts on a particular crime or criminal, but targets must be selected with great care, and each task Force must have an end date, weighed against advances in their inquiries.
Chasing one crook with a team does not stop any group, whether loosely or formally organised. As the police knock off the kingpin, there is a conga line of deputies to fill the void, so the net gain for the community is close to zero; not always, but often enough to instil greater care in Police strategies.
Furthermore, it appears that being incarcerated does not interfere with a criminal’s criminal endeavours; it’s just a bit more inconvenient.
And all that time and effort does nothing to stop more young thugs from being recruited from the local police areas, and the local police are so busy just responding to the community’s direct concerns that they cannot take action to redirect some of these junior thugs from crime.
Police can do that; they did it regularly in the past.

A solution is not easy, but the Chef Commissioner could do no worse than a recommendation of the CAA to establish a Police Inspectorate attached directly to his Office that will ensure his policies are implemented.
The Inspectorate would field a team of senior Officers who would actually visit Police operations and locations to ensure policy is being implemented and that the operational supervisors of all ranks are providing adequate supervision and support for the front line. If they are not, they should be immediately removed from their position.
Our operational frontline police deserve nothing less.
Patrolling and checking young individuals or groups is a powerful tool that is underused because of poor resource management and a lack of members’ skills.
Interestingly, police managers could learn from the Ukrainian conflict.
Ukraine is currently having some success in its defence against Russia to prevent it from capturing more of Ukraine’s territory, early days, but the tide is turning in favour of Ukraine, because they deal with the frontal assaults in a conventional manner and focus on the logistical support that maintains the enemy. They have changed strategy from focusing on eliminating the Russian leaders to focusing on the logistics. That is not to say that if a Russian General is stupid enough to put himself at risk, he will more than likely be eliminated. But focusing on Logistics will grind the enemy army to a halt. Severely depleting food, fuel and ammunition, forcing capitulation
Any army, no matter its size or strength, cannot operate effectively without a reliable logistics supply. According to reports, the effectiveness of the Ukrainian Army in severely hampering logistics has had a large adverse effect on the Russian ability to attack further.
There is an argument for a similar approach in the war against Crime, particularly crime that is organised.
Like Ukraine, VicPol’s effectiveness in reining in crime lies with the development of new innovations, both technically, administratively, and in personnel/resource management. A role coordinated and managed by an effective Force Inspectorate.
If a Police member is promoted to a new rank, they must accept accountability for their subordinates’ performance, and the current practice of blaming them must be substantially tempered.
A system to reinforce accountability across all ranks will go a long way toward creating Force-wide improvements in operations and staff morale.
The reality is that the community’s discontent with Policing will continue to grow with the inevitable pressure on Politicians to implement a Royal Commission into Policing in Victoria, if only to take the heat off themselves.
A Royal Commission will take years, and the management of Policing will inevitably be impacted and wrested from the Chief Commissioner’s control.
That outcome will be a bad day for Policing and the Victorian community.
We are not adverse to a Commission of Inquiry to assist the Chief Commissioner
We have already seen the adverse impact of political interference in Policing during COVID, and it must not happen again.
We have a competent Chief Commissioner; we should do everything to support him.
by CAA | Jun 11, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
Ivan Ray
Again, more good work by journalist Grace Frost of the Herald Sun, revealing just how dire the crime problem is in Country Victoria.
Following on from her recent Locked Out revelation on the escalation of crime linked to the closure of Metropolitan Police Stations, she has now exposed an even greater problem in Country Victoria, with absolutely diabolical crime rate increases.
Before delving into the issue, we need to make it absolutely clear that this is not the complete fault of the current Chief Commissioner, Mike Bush; however, he has the task of fixing it.
He inherited this strategy of closing Police Station inquiry facilities from previous administrations, and it had become a culturally entrenched strategy before his arrival.
You might reasonably say that the closure of public access to police stations has now become the norm and is culturally ingrained in the Police management psyche.
Bush’s pledge to Victoria to get more police out of stations and onto the road to prevent and detect crime is very sound and strongly supported by the CAA; however, the application of this commitment has been hijacked by the easiest solution: closing the inquiry counters and police stations.
Some years ago, we witnessed the spectacle of the consequences of a spectacular road crash in the middle of the day outside a major Eastern Suburbs Police Station. Police poured out of the station. The head count of Police who were able to attend the scene was just shy of 50, but only a small number were required to deal with the incident.
While there may have been even more Police on duty at the time, because there are police activities that would preclude some members from leaving their post, although this incident may be isolated, it goes a long way to explaining why policing is currently ineffective.
The Police crowd at the scene included a number of police officers who were of supervisor/manager rank, yet not one showed leadership in herding the throng back to work or, more importantly, herding them onto patrol.
Our position is that the issue of inadequate Police on the road is a management one, and the Police station inquiry counter closures are a simple fix designed to avoid managers being responsible for better utilisation of resources and managing police member resources effectively.
Over time, the motivation for members to avoid going out on the road or foot patrol has become an anathema.
There is, however, a solution, and that means measuring techniques for the performance and effectiveness of Police Stations and individual members.
“What gets measured gets done”.
Out of the statistics produced by Frost, the most disturbing example has to be the situation at Rupanyup, a small country town in the central western Wimmera region of Victoria.
The town, not far from the Northern Grampians Region, with an increased crime rate of +47%, has had its Police Station closed for months.

So much for the idyllic country lifestyle.
It was reported by Frost that police patrolling regional closed-station areas were twice as likely to be resisted by offenders as anywhere else in the state.
A staggering 1094 resist or hinder police offences were recorded in locked-out country towns last year – up +45.7 per cent on 2023.
What is significant in these shocking numbers is the personal risk to the Police as well as the community, and the silence of the Police Association (TPAV).
Comparing the TPAV support for the functional ability of the Police organisation and the welfare of its members, with the efforts of the Fire Fighters Union supporting the firefighters and the community they serve, creates a stark contrast. Highly vocal and politically adroit, they shame the comparative inaction of the TPAV.
Police members deserve and should demand a lot better from their Union.
(We would be happy to publish a piece from the TPAV explaining their inaction.)
Further examples from data released by the Herald Sun make for a horrifying read.
- In just two years, regional communities stripped of 24-hour access to their local police stations have suffered a 24.6 per cent surge in criminal offences – the steepest rise across the state.
- A Herald Sun analysis of official data shows crime is now skyrocketing almost 80per cent faster in locked-out country neighbourhoods than in Melbourne’s CBD, according to data weighted to reflect population sizes.
- Crime had soared by 22.4 per cent in neighbourhoods where a police station had reduced its opening hours, compared to 15.7 per cent in areas that kept cop shops open.
- In fact, 80 per cent of the regional towns locked from their local stations recorded crime spikes on par with or worse than the state average – despite Victoria Police promises that increased patrols would keep those communities safe.
| Impacted regional council area |
Total offences, 2025 |
Change since 2023 |
| Glenelg |
2489 |
+52% |
| Northern Grampians |
1584 |
+47% |
| Moorabool |
3502 |
+35% |
| Mount Alexander |
1458 |
+33% |
| Colac-Otway |
1935 |
+31% |
| Macedon Ranges |
2620 |
+23% |
| East Gippsland |
6497 |
+23% |
| Central Goldfields |
1441 |
+20% |
| Latrobe |
14172 |
+20% |
| Ararat |
1566 |
+11% |
| Southern Grampians |
1267 |
+3% |
| |
|
|
Victims seeking shelter during the night in those country towns need to drive an average of 23km (about 20 minutes) to reach the nearest open police station
. Suffering the most extreme crime surges in the state were Glenelg (+52%) and the Northern Grampians (+47%), both of which had station hours reduced three years ago.
We would argue strongly that the problems of Victoria Police are not solely about the overall numbers, but more significantly, how the existing resources are managed.
The issue is clearly not solely with the front-line Police. Though change may face resistance, it stems from an organisation where promotions since the 2000’s have been predominantly based on nepotism rather than ability or actual performance; the community and the Police members are now paying the price.
Executive Officers and their staff also need to get out and visit stations unannounced at different times and review the actual functions of supervisors and those members on duty at any given time.
Station Commanders and lower-ranking officers then need to explain any anomalies in staff task management.
It won’t solve the problems overnight, but it will help if supervisors need to keep an eye over their shoulder to ensure they won’t be embarrassed or disciplined.
The necessity is for Force executives to develop proper performance measurement techniques in line with the Force objectives. All staff functionalities must be benchmarked and measured with extreme urgency, and the philosophy of “What gets measured gets done” must be adopted.
by CAA | Jun 10, 2026 | Library, Politics, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues
Ivan Ray
The Herald Sun journalist Grace Frost has ‘blown the gaff’ on the crime impact of Police Station Closures, in another embarrassment for Victoria Police.
Rather than accepting the fact that there was a simple error in the calculations that VicPol was relying on to justify the Police Station closures, VicPol doubled down initially until the journalist forced an admission that the figures the Force was relying on were not only misleading but blatantly false, feeding a false narrative that closing police stations had no negative effect on crime.
The Force response suggests that the error could have been deliberate rather than accidental. “It was just a typo”, doesn’t wash at all.
Typos get checked if anybody cares to take accountability for their command/management responsibilities.
It was reported that the response to the error being identified to VicPol indicates that this was no accident.
The response from the VicPol or Government spin doctors was,
“Reducing counter hours ensures police can continue patrolling each of these communities to prevent and quickly respond to crime.”
The truth is actually the direct opposite. Doh!, as the Simpsons would say.

Graphics courtesy Herald Sun
No matter how the spin doctors might try to fudge the numbers, a 22% increase in crime in areas where stations are closed or have reduced opening hours is a monumental law-enforcement calamity.
It also goes some way to reinforce the problems faced by the Chief Commissioner when this sort of thing is allowed to occur under the watch of his senior officers.
The executive officers who presented the argument of closing police stations to the Force Command, on the basis that it will allow police to reduce crime, is a completely ill-informed crock, and they must be held to account.
It also shows how out of touch the Executive can become when ensconced in the Command environment, losing sight of the realities of the police role in the community.
This incident is a gross failure of the Senior Command responsible, and there is just no coming back from the conclusion that these nefarious data claims were either politically or internally created to justify a failed policy shift. Trying to cover someone’s exposed buttocks.
Most disturbing is that the authors of this blunder or mischief do not understand the community they serve and the role the local Police Station plays in crime prevention.
It cannot be dismissed that the introduction of Super Stations, generally around the early 2000’s, and the demise of smaller community-based stations coincide with the start of the crime tsunami we now endure.
We would have thought most senior people would be aware of this trend; if not, they should have been.
.A simple explanation of the roles of Police Stations and how they have changed gives proper insights.
.Super Station:
- Often referred to as the Fire Brigade approach, where Police exit the Station to attend events, similar to how the fire brigade responds, and return after the matter is resolved or they are redirected to another problem.
- Less “front counter centric” a “less service delivery strategy”.
- Focus on backend policing capability. Whatever that means, is clearly not working.
- Public contact may be centralised, reduced or eliminated to favour electronic contact (the impersonal call centre approach). Dealing with traumatised citizens by a call centre is an unconscionable and cruel policy.
Standard Station:
- Strong local visibility, connection, and ownership of their community.
- Community-facing (reports, walk-ins, local issues) “Increased service delivery”.
- The problem with the Super Stations and the demise of the Local Station breaks the contract between the Police and the community.
The bridge between the community and the police has been fractured, and we are now paying the price.
The impact of 22% increase in crime, reasonably attributed to Station closures or restricted hours, takes the heat off the Judiciary, as this number, a 22% increase in crime, is something the Courts have not achieved, although by their performance, they seem to be trying to.
There is a role for a Super Station or a Headquarters Station, but not at the expense of the Local Station, where the community has ownership, and there is a reciprocal connection between the Police and their community, a sense of ownership and responsibility for their community, not achieved in Super Stations, which are often many kilometres away from the fringes of the area they are required to Police..
The problem is that decision-makers within the Force and the Government lack a clear understanding of the immeasurable impact that an open Police Station has on the community, particularly on those involved in the commission of crimes. Equally, the importance of having somewhere to go if in danger cannot be dismissed as inconsequential; having the option is the key.
The argument that the Stations are not really closed but only the front counter is flawed, as what the community, including the crooks, see is what faces them.
The solution is blatantly obvious and has been at the forefront of CAA recommendations for many years. The move to recruit former Police as Force Reservists will provide an opportunity to reverse the current strategy.
It must be introduced as a matter of urgency.
Moreover, the Reservist postings must also be open to serving members who are struggling with operations and can move to the reserve list after an initial period of 5 years of front-line operations – a better option (and cheaper) than having them crumble and be boarded out.
Although unlikely, the Police Association should be very vocal on this issue, supporting struggling members.
The Chief Commissioner must put pressure on the Government to remove an upper limit on the number of reservists that can be employed. The numbers would only be limited by the overall Force authorised strength.
The current allocation of reservists is 200+, whatever that ‘+’ means, and the functions for Reservists as part of Service delivery are only a third-tier priority.
So, the likelihood of substantial gains in the number of Police Stations opening is very problematic.
The anticipated work for reservists includes:
- Front desk enquiries
- Non‑urgent reports
- Public assistance and referrals
- Victim follow‑up contact.
Add to that, telephone inquiries and their impact may be more substantial; however, the numbers are of great concern and need to be closer to 1000 to enable 24/7 functions to cover reservist leave and rest days rather than just 9-5 pm. This will allow more reservists to be attracted and accommodate part-time commitments.
Simply providing the low numbers anticipated will have little material effect on Police Station opening hours.
This raises the question of at what stage in the growth of crime will activate the Government and the Force to address the problem with the available resources sitting in the community, the ubiquitous Reservist.
by CAA | Jun 8, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues
The annual Police Community Survey has opened, but you need to be quick as it closes at the end of this month. See https://engage.vic.gov.au/vicpol-2026
The strategy for these surveys has been carefully crafted so that there is a guaranteed minimal response, the important questions are omitted, and there is very little marketing of the Survey’s existence. You may find out about it if you are in the know, but it’s hardly a reliable strategy to monitor community sentiment.
The 2025 Survey only attracted measly 7,600 responses, a number not far from less than half the overall strength of the Force and with a population served by the Force of 7 million people, the best they can do is this meagre amount. a number so small that it is statistically useless.
Although equally useless, it would have looked better if the whole Force had taken the survey.
We are not suggesting that the Police themselves provided all the answers, but it certainly looks like they may have had substantial input; they knew of its existence.
Outside of the Police employees, the reach would have been very limited.
With Law and Order, such a topical issue in the community, this response number is embarrassingly pathetic.
The 2026 survey is the 4th annual one, and it is generally a waste of time and money. Money that could be well spent elsewhere.
The same top two priorities from the initial 2023 survey have remained consistent every year. The top 5 issues raised by respondents in 2025 are the same as those in 2024, and surveying and achieving results that are already, or should already be, bleeding-obvious, is also an embarrassment and the next best thing to pathetic.
An extract from the report on the 2025 survey reinforces the issues raised in this piece.
Key safety concerns (2025 survey)
‘Safety in public places’ and ‘safety of my property and possessions’ have remained the top two safety concerns for Victorians since 2023. The top five safety concerns in 2025 remained the same as those reported in 2024.
Victorian residents have told us their top five safety concerns in 2025 are:
-
-
- Safety in public places
- Safety of my property and possessions
- Drugs and alcohol
- Road safety
- Serious and organised crime
Your ideas
Respondents were given the opportunity to share their ideas on how to make them feel safer. (Putting the responsibility on the community, diverting from the Force is weakness personified) The top theme that emerged from these comments relates to visible policing, including a desire for increased foot patrols, night patrols, 24/7 station staffing, and more Protective Services Officers on various types of transport and at community locations. Other themes that emerged relate to judicial and legislative reform, community engagement, road policing, and infrastructure improvement.
See https://engage.vic.gov.au/vicpol-2025.
But what did the Force do with all these ideas, and what was the success or community feedback?
Although we are not privy to the relationship or consultation that occurs between VicPol and Engage Victoria, the Government quango responsible for the survey, it might be an idea to have a statistician represent the Force in the design of a decent survey to make it more meaningful.
Additionally, the way the Survey is marketed seems aimed squarely at Police apparatchiks, making its data output highly questionable.
We have not seen the use of general media to reach the broader community (yes, paid ads); however, what is a huge embarrassment for VicPol is that, in their 4th year, nothing has improved.
There are quite a few waffle words on the website implying success, but we all know that there has been little improvement, but rather deterioration in how safe we feel.
Do not, however, assume that this is the fault of the Police altogether, as we have a Chief Commissioner with a Herculean task of bringing a demoralised and deteriorated Force up to an adequate standard, and this sort of garbage survey doesn’t help him or the Force.
A fundamental tenet of any survey should be to help guide the organisation toward effectiveness.
So why were there no questions about Service Delivery?
Why wasn’t the role of other agencies that influence community safety measured?
Why wasn’t the role of the Courts included?
There is a plethora of other issues that should be measured; however, the whole exercise should have one focus, and that is to identify mechanisms to implement measuring techniques of Force outputs, Members’ and Management performance at all levels measured against a process of benchmarking all aspects of the Force’s functions.
Catching crooks is not the only role of policing, but it is the easiest to measure, hence things like a sense of safety and well-being in the community are ignored and, in part, seen as not a police function; arrant rubbish, preventing crime is far more desirable for the community than the alternative, ask them.
And when you start measuring the organisation’s performance, an adage comes to the fore:
‘What gets measured gets done’.
As is our normal practice, when we solicit, we always provide solutions for consideration.
If you want to build community trust, you need to engage.
For many police officers, unless they are dealing with a crook, to some extent, engaging with the community can take a long time to master and can be very difficult. You cannot assume successful engagement is automatic. However, there is an easy and extremely effective way to bring the community on board.
Design a series of one-page B5 handouts on how to make your house, your car, and your family safe.
Provide them to Stations to be handed out by foot patrols or left with retailers for distribution.
As important as simple content is, the design must be capable of attracting the reader. The flyer also needs a phone number that citizens can call to reach their local Police Station for further advice.
To further benefit Policing overall, the newly recruited Reserve Force members should be deployed alongside Probationary Constables to deliver the flyers.
This has the benefit of experienced reserve members with their community knowledge and experience imparting to newbies engagement techniques, as well as issues around their personal safety in the public space.
Members who are used in this exercise need to be given ownership of the area they are allocated, which allows easy and accurate measuring of the program so that it can be modified if necessary to improve efficiency, and the bonus is that the probationer can devote any of their spare patrol time to their community.
This program provides Probationers with the opportunity to begin learning job satisfaction, an outcome for the community that they can own and be proud of. This will serve them well when they face the less-than-savoury matters the police must deal with during their careers.
This is called Crime Prevention, Community Engagement, or whatever title somebody sees fit; however, one thing is for sure: it will work with minimal impact on resources.
All the Force has to do is manage the nay-sayers within.
This survey doesn’t need to be a secret, but a useful tool if done properly.

DONATE
by CAA | May 28, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
Ivan Ray May ’26
The Herald Sun reported on the 26th of May 2026, the comments from Victoria Police regarding the youth crisis.
The report calls on the Government to coordinate a response to tackle Melbourne’s gang scourge better.
That is code for “It’s about time to get your bloody act together”.
We, like the vast majority of the police and large swathes of the community, are heartened by the Force being so outspoken, calling out the flaws within the Legal processes.
It augers well for VicPol as Chief Commissioner Bush finds his feet, the Force finds its voice and throws the shackles of silence in the WPB – good stuff, really.
However, the response from opposing quarters, the self-righteous left who make up the majority of these Government functions, will be interesting, now that the boot is on the other foot, and they are being roundly criticised, supported by the majority of Victorians, who are tired of inaction and lack of accountability in some Government quarters.
We hope the media will sharpen their pens and focus on these entities, who are generally just unaccountable, wind whistlers.
This police criticism is aimed, not too subtly, at the Courts, particularly the Children’s Court, Corrections Victoria, Departments of Education, Families and Housing, Youth Justice, as well as Local Community leaders (Local Government).
The one glaring anomaly that jumps out is that while the Police are under constant scrutiny, and that is not necessarily a bad thing, these other Government functions are not, to any effective degree. And that is despite what they claim.
The other issue is the apparent lack of accountability among these government entities for youth or for their functions generally.
We have a huge problem, largely created by the Courts, and there are no signs they are taking responsibility or taking action to rectify the issue.
With all their bluster and rapier criticism, particularly of the police, they generally get away scot-free and, while drawing indecent salaries, show no interest in their organisations performing to an acceptable standard.
Benchmarking performance is one of those terms that they believe does not apply to them. After all, they are the Public Service, two words whose natural meaning is foreign to them, Public and Service.
Additionally, it would be useful if the outcomes of the judges’ sentencing decisions, in particular, were monitored electronically to weigh against benchmarking.
If an offender who has been sentenced or bailed reoffends, then the original decision was flawed.
A jurist’s failing would, at least, practically trigger the need for additional training, but continued failure must raise the question of the jurist’s suitability to sit on these matters.
The CAA has, for nearly ten years, coincidentally a similar time frame to the escalation of our current crime Tsunami, argued for a Judicial Review Panel to monitor and take action where necessary for failures in the judicial system and the performance of Justices.
While we continue to have Jurists playing at Social Engineering instead of dispensing Justice, we are never going to see improvements in crime rates.
A very relevant comment in an article on youth crime was attributed to an experienced police officer who said,
“We’ve got a cohort who are disconnected from reality,” he said.
“They don’t understand consequences. They don’t understand that if you stab someone, they could die.”
One could effectively argue that youths are not the only ones disconnected from reality.
This could equally apply to many of the Judicial brethren.
Another glaring example of Social Engineering trumping Justice was reported on the same day, when a Children’s Court Magistrate sent a sixteen-year-old home after the teenager pleaded guilty to four charges of arson, including the high-profile Bar Bambi fire.
The youth, it was claimed, had an IQ of less than 40, allegedly somewhere between that of a child aged 6 and 8.
The court accepted that he was mentally disabled, and as his parents had provided incredible love and support, the child didn’t understand.
As the experienced Policemen elsewhere in this piece claimed, this youth fell into the category of ‘disconnected from reality’ and ‘not understanding the consequences.
So, the magistrate sent him home. As he did with the other coofenderrs.
Precisely where the clash of Social Engineering fails, and how the Courts feed children into the revolving door of crime.
All the lectures from the judges are just white noise to these kids, a waste of the court’s time.
The child now has bragging rights over the Court and is enabled to gain respect from his peers and to move up the social pecking order within his network , strengthening his lack of accountability.
What the Court overlooked was that he had the mental capacity to carry out the crime successfully. Would a 6-8-year-old be physically or mentally capable of such a crime?
Twelve months away from his phone, his criminal masters, and loss of freedom might just let him escape the crime revolving door as he matures a bit. Of course, that depends entirely on the effectiveness of the other services responsible for managing intellectually inept young people, in teaching them that unacceptable actions attract unpleasant consequences.
The Judge in this case directed that, among other things, the boy delete all his contacts on his cell phone. The chances of compliance with these or the other instructions in the Judicial lecture are next to zero.
That is a disconnection from reality by the bench, not the perpetrator.
Counselling and all the other nice-to-dos with kids are a waste of time, and they need to be taught that certain behaviours have uncomfortable consequences, and that has no bearing on their IQ. Even 6–8-year-olds can and do understand right from wrong, no matter how much certain sectors promote the view that they do not- these out-of-touch ideologues need to step aside to allow for pragmatic justice.
A Justice Review Panel would have a field day with this magistrate over his failure to explain why he took a Social justice approach instead of serving justice, not only for the child but also for the victims and the broader community. This is an inappropriate approach to this child’s life.
As stated elsewhere,
“We’ve got a cohort who are disconnected from reality,” he said.
In this context, we are referring to jurists and others in the juvenile justice system.
It’s no good looking to the Police for a solution; the majority are ever more asking the same question about their role: ‘what’s the point?’
Why should they put their life on the line, risking Physical as well as Mental injury, when all their hard work is thrown aside for Social Engineering by the judiciary?
There is one outstanding positive from this debacle for the Police: the Force has become vocal on this issue, and that will have a very positive impact, at least on mental injury – the Force supports them.

DONATE
by CAA | May 25, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
Ivan Ray May’26
There is no question that Firebombing, or extortion, is now completely out of control, and the public is looking to the police to protect them.
As hard as they may try to do their job, they are unlikely to succeed without the tools to do it.
But before commenting on the tools needed, it is worthwhile to consider what is happening and what is likely to happen.
As we discuss this matter, reflect on why this criminal phenomenon seems to be concentrated in Victoria.
What started as a tool of extortion in the illegal tobacco retail industry, where firebombing was a method to gain control of market share by competing criminals, and reluctant retailers selling illicit products supplied by a particular criminal cohort, the Firebomb strategy was developed as an easy and cheap method to gain compliance by terrorising retailers, landlords, retail staff and customers.
The advantage of this strategy is that they could use kids to do the dangerous stuff for chump change, and the spectacular nature of each event made for sensational media, further amplifying the consequences of non-compliance with the extortion.
Unwittingly, the media has played into the criminals’ hands, doing all the marketing for them.
The media gives greater credibility to the extortion demands because they are not hollow, unlike when any half-baked crook can leave a note pinned to a business door, and the extortion process has begun.
Keeping the organisers at arm’s length from the actual fires, they believe they are somewhat insulated should things go pear-shaped.
But what started as a process restricted to the illegal tobacco industry has now evolved into one of the most serious criminal epidemics Victoria has faced, and nothing of substance is being done about it.
From tobacco stores, the next move was to take on the Nightclubs and Bars with bootleg booze, which, to some degree, is a cover for protection money, a critical part of the move. This extortion is highly clandestine, and the full extent of this criminality is unknown. You can be assured it is widespread, as business owners trying to survive in the current economic climate will not reveal they are being extorted, because that is how extortion works.
The future trajectory is plain to see, with liquor warehouses with over $3.5m damage, Sex shops, innocent people having their cars torched, and car dealerships being targeted.
Most Victorians have generally considered that this spate won’t affect them directly, given the targets thus far. Still, the real danger is that more and more crooks will jump on the Extortion bandwagon of easy money, and it will impact all of us.
It is inevitable, and it won’t be long before other businesses are targeted with straight-out extortion. Pay protection money, or you get a visit from our fire team.
Your local Supermarket, fish and chip shop, McDonald’s, Chemist, and petrol station (the bombing of a petrol station would be catastrophic but with the knuckle heads the criminals use, anything can happen) will all be vulnerable to the growth of this insidious criminality, where the extortion can remain hidden as business people are coerced into paying the extortion rather than risk their business, staff and or their customers.
We are confident this activity is no longer down to one or two crime lords but a plethora of would-be crime kings.
Easy money is the crooks’ incentive, and they are attracted to it like a moth to a light. The longer we leave the light on, the more moths that will be attracted.
Hoping that no innocent person is harmed is just wistful thinking and not very useful because we need urgent action to get on top of this issue before it gets on top of us.
If you think that the Police will solve this, you are naive. It will take far more than that because we are probably at this stage because we have hamstrung the police for too long, and now we are paying the price.
This is a government problem, and only the government can address it.
This list is not exhaustive, as there are obviously things that can be done, but priority should be given to recalling Parliament to deal with this urgent issue in a non-partisan way, where ideology is put aside for the welfare of this State and its citizenry.
Legislation is required.
- Introducing a new criminal offence for individuals recruiting, managing or otherwise facilitating children under 18 to commit a crime.This offence must reverse the onus of association with a child onto the accused, requiring the accused to show that the interaction was lawful. Upon conviction, a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of five years and a maximum of fifteen years must apply.
- Introduce minimum mandatory sentencing for those convicted of extortion and associated offences under the Crimes Act. Knowing that they face a minimum of five years’ jail without parole will dissuade many fringe players.
- Abolish by Legislation the ‘doli Incapax’ legal tenet and leave it to the Jurists to decide how best to deal with juvenile offenders. Remove the bureaucratic intervention in criminal matters. Applying this tenet does not serve a child well. Being granted an age exemption feeds into the juvenile mind of unaccountability.
- Establish, as a matter of urgency, a Judicial Review Panel to manage the efficiency and performance of all courts and jurists. Remove inefficiencies and develop benchmarks for jurists to maintain high performance. The current system has failed and has contributed to the high-end evolution of criminality.
- Urgently reintroduce the Consorting Legislation so that the police have a weapon to manage the criminal element.
- Embrace new technology to allow access, without a warrant, to communications, encrypted or not, between criminals, including the youths they attempt to recruit, and, if necessary, employ high-end expertise in this area.
- Legislate the power for the Police to apply to the Courts for a warrant to access this and other metadata from declared individuals on a long-term basis. The legislation must empower the courts to direct Telco companies to cooperate with each warrant.
- Provide the Chief Commissioner with the necessary budget and authority to explore the latest technology in crime fighting to gather intelligence to avoid criminal endeavours, targeting the communication systems used by the criminal class.
Compromising their ability to communicate, supported by updated consorting laws that encompass electronic consorting, will be the most potent weapon and could have immediate as well as long-term impact.
While we are unaware of the level of expertise currently available to VicPol, the strictest confidence as to the current Force’s skills level in this area is understandable and justifiable. Given the success and rapid growth of the criminal extortion rackets, which appear to be accelerating rather than abating, it is clear that VicPol has been found wanting in this area.
The Parliament must accept responsibility and address this matter as a matter of urgency, as it is fast approaching a life-or-death scenario; if truth be told, we are probably already there.
Wake up, Victoria. The next firebomb might be yours.

DONATE
by CAA | May 19, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
Noel Newnham, May 2026
The devious Left is slowly beginning to reveal itself. It has long been the case that a fairly large group of the political left hates and detests anything that might conceivably pose any opposition to its own worldview. Thus, they “know” how to deal with crime and criminals, and the police are loathed and shunted aside for daring to have a view.
No wonder there is no traction for views that talk about real consequences for crime. Only the do-nothing left are perceived as having a worthwhile view.
But it goes further. The same cabal now seems to be stepping up its campaign against the Australian Defence Force.
Consider, this is the mob that refused to allow returning Vietnam Vets to march through our capital cities; men and women who served their country were treated like pariahs by the new government whose political aims were not served by acknowledging such iconic values as mateship, sacrifice and service.
They are not game to say it but they divide and they destroy and they belittle those who hold a contrary view.
Take the case of Ben Roberts-Smith. I make no real comment on what I understand to be the merits of the case beyond this:
- That any criminal prosecution based upon secret and unidentified informers must be suspect.
- That identity evidence, notoriously unreliable at the best of times, has to be crucial but seems to be more than a little shaky, in this case.
- That the outrageous public conflating of drinking from a prosthesis as somehow probative of murder makes those who did that more than irresponsible headline hunters, but more like head-hunters out to contaminate any future jury pool.
- The treatment of BRS by the Federal Police, his unnecessary and media-staged arrest, was completely disgraceful. There can be no doubt that BRS would have answered a summons, or if an arrest was truly necessary, then the common practice of surrender for arrest could have been used.
But then the recent budget set aside millions of dollars for finding more “war criminals” – more victims for our moralistic crusaders against Australian values and institutions.
You know, these are the guys who will not allow an examination of the abuse of Aboriginal children – so that some get killed; the same guys who force us to buy batteries made with cobalt extracted by slave-like labour in Africa rather than with Australian-mined cobalt.
Morality be damned; it is much more the case that they set out to divide us to rule us.
Was it Marx who preached the need to destroy in order to rebuild to your own specifications?
Meanwhile, publicly exposed rorting of major government projects continues. We all get ripped off by – at the very least, massively negligent public officials.
Does anyone else feel pummelled into insensitivity, or is it just me?

DONATE
by CAA | May 16, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
Ivan Ray May’26
doli incapax’, all sounds too cute by half. Still, this legal principle from over 400 years ago is nothing but an embarrassment for any government that supports it, let alone the judiciary.
The doctrine of doli incapax (Latin for “incapable of wrongdoing”) was not introduced at a single fixed date in the way modern statutes are. Instead, it developed gradually in the early stages of the common law.
Doli incapax, emerged in English common law by at least the 17th century (1600s), and was already well‑established by the 18th century. [mylawquestions.com], [legalclarity.org]
The idea comes from ancient legal traditions, influenced by Roman law and early medieval English law. [researchpo…bria.ac.uk] from an era referred to by academics as the’ Dark Ages’.
With that pedigree, the concept of Doli incapax should have been relegated to History decades ago.
- It developed into a clear doctrine in English common law, where:
- By the time of Blackstone’s Commentaries (1760s), this structure was already firmly recognised in law. [legalclarity.org]
That means the doctrine was effectively part of the legal system centuries before modern legislation, rather than being “introduced” by a single Act. In the 17th Century.
So here we are, some 400 years later, applying this antiquated legal principle to a feckless thirteen-year-old girl, that even in those dark ages would have at least been required to prove that she didn’t know she was doing wrong.
In the 17th century, there were no State schools for the lower classes. Moral and legal education of children was in the hands of mostly illiterate parents. That is no longer the case, and if schools are not filling the void, we need to ask ‘Why’?
Whilst we like to feel that our legal system is current and can be relied upon to deliver Justice, by and large successfully, this ancient hangover drags the Justice system backwards.
The emotional argument that locking up kids is somehow immoral has many flaws.
The flawed argument promoted is that it’s aimed at saving children from themselves.
How does putting children who are addicted to crime back on the streets to reoffend, save them from themselves?
Committing a serious crime is inherently very dangerous to the perpetrators as it is to the victim.
Will it take the death of a child to make legislators realise the dangers to the children, let alone the community?
It is worth remembering that when Doli incapax evolved, cars and access to technology and a range of other innovations had not been considered, let alone developed.
To provide legislation to remove the defence of Doli incapax may seem an overreach, but the example of the 13-year-old committing 109 offences, of a serious nature, is a case that highlights the folly of persistence with this ancient concept.
What is overlooked is that this principle is applied prior to any evidence being tested, so the evidence of the allegations is never tested.
- The many victims of the child will continue to live in fear and without closure.
- No action to change the behaviour of the child is mandated.
- The impact on this case on any young person with aspirations for criminal notoriety, is manna from heaven.
It is noteworthy that when Doli incapax was created around 460 years ago there was no social media for young people to communicate. That didn’t happen until the 2000’s, some 400 years later, so the adverse impact on the deterrent factor of this public information has only started to be felt.
This phenomenon will increase as the young people see the outcome of the criminality and know that their age entitles them to do what they like, as they aspire to be like their role models in the criminal sphere. One of the preeminent driving forces for Juvenile crime.
It is not unreasonable to predict that applying the Doli incapax rule will have a severe and lasting adverse impact on the young accused.
These include.
- Without consequences for their actions, the likelihood of making the child bulletproof to the impact of the law will promote further and escalating lawless activity.
- The child will continue to be exposed to extremely dangerous behaviours likely to have disastrous consequences for the well-being of the child as well as the victims.
- The risks to the community from this child’s behaviour are unacceptable.
- This 13-year-old will be highly regarded by her peers, who are also on the cusp of lawlessness.
- She has been handed the ability to recruit and lead other children down her criminal path.
The sentence of Doli incapax imposed on this child by the ‘Justice’ system will ensure she never makes old bones.
That a criminal is young should only impact the sentence, and that is a matter for the courts and can only be applied if they are convicted.
Furthermore, to compare the mental acuity of a child of the 1600’s to children of today is disingenuous at the very least.
From their physical development through nutrition to their mental development through education and access to social media, they are light-years ahead of their early peers.
The community, however, is well attuned to the development of young people, and anyone who has experience with young people will attest to their knowledge of right from wrong and what is criminal is well entrenched.
We call on all politicians to make the necessary legislative changes to consign this antiquated principle to history where it belongs.
Leave the matters of adjudicating evidence-based justice to the Jurists, not legal bureaucrats.

DONATE
by CAA | May 5, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
Ivan Ray May ’26
The Government has just announced sweeping changes to sentencing as a strategy to fix the crime problem. The ‘Allan govt orders $3m review of Victoria’s Sentencing Act’ as reported in the Herald Sun, 5th of May 2026.
There are probably areas of the Sentencing Act that need updating, but a full review is nonsensical and will do nothing to slow the escalating crime rate.
With the latest spate of fire bombings, innocent lives will inevitably be lost in this extortion racket.
The government could do a lot better if it took notice of people like the CAA,
The CAA was established over 10 years ago to give victims a voice on Law and Order issues and has attracted former Police with a combined Policing experience of over 500 years. They are supported by a large group of non-police, representing a wide cross-section of the community. Ranging from victims of horrific crime to several Health professionals to people with corporate experience and the entertainment industry.
The Police experience covers all ranks and all police functions, both operationally and corporately.
The 500 number is growing as more and more former Police officers are dissatisfied with the performance of the Force to which they have committed a large part of their lives. The common thread that binds them is that the Force can be so much better; Victoria and the serving members deserve it.
Not all the issues are the fault of the Force, and poorly briefed governments have made their fair share of clangers, and this announcement is one of them.
While the CAA struggles financially to survive, the government will waste millions on a strategy doomed to fail.
The CAA strongly recommends that,
An Independent Law and Order Standing Commission be established with bipartisan support to oversee all matters concerning Law and Order and Good Governance within the Criminal Justice system.
Getting an effective and efficient Criminal Justice system that punishes wrongdoers might just give the Victoria Police under Mike Bush the chance to reform and improve the lives of Victorians and the Police who serve them.
A reform that would be a cheaper and more effective strategy than just throwing our money at it for a limited outcome.
Changing the sentencing laws will achieve nothing to impact this crime spike. These lowlifes committing these horrendous crimes wouldn’t have a clue or, moreover, be influenced by governments or anybody else talking tough; to the juvenile idiots, this is just white noise if they even hear it.
Remember, these kids committing these crimes are influenced by the mature crooks whom they are trying to emulate, so who do you reckon they will listen to?
The common denominator in most juvenile crime is that the offenders are generally already on bail for earlier offences that are not yet resolved.
The courts use the flimsiest excuse to avoid locking up kids on the premise that this will only make them worse.
This ‘woke’ approach promotes the ideology that locking kids up will make them worse than what they are already; they are already in the worst category, committing high-end crime.
But at least if they are not out on bail, they are not committing more crimes.
No, the current proposal won’t work; the focus needs to be on holding the courts to account.
There is chatter about minimum sentencing, but the problem is that if a minimum sentence applies to an offence and the Jurist doesn’t philosophically agree with the concept, they will find a way not to convict. They have many options at their disposal.
That government strategy will fail before it starts and will feed into the untouchable ethos of criminal juveniles, making the problem worse, not better.

DONATE
by CAA | May 4, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
Ivan Ray May’26
How often do you need to be bitten before chaining the Dog?
It seems that 10 years is not long enough.
Since its formation, the Community Advocacy Alliance has been arguing that the current approach to policing is flawed, and no effort has been made over this period to seriously address the issues we have continually raised.
Dismissed as old ‘has-beens’ not in touch with today’s reality, to be ignored. But 10 years of consistency must now be seriously considered because the CAA, much to the chagrin of the critics, has been proven right and the naysayers wrong.
The CAA has equal representation of Police and concerned citizens from a broad church and is a true microcosm of the broader population.
The CAA warned of a crime Tsunami and published a Plan to address the issues in 2017, in a document entitled ‘PLAN 100’. (see link below). This document has had four iterations, but the principles of the original remain unresolved or even unacknowledged by Victoria Police or the Government.
From cause to solution, the CAA has published a plethora of articles exceeding 500, addressing aspects of the issues. We have now achieved an average monthly readership of over 20,000, that’s over 100,000 per year.
A lot of interested/concerned Victorians by any matrix.
Below are extracts from published articles that led to the first Plan we submitted to VicPol and the then Government to address these issues.
Plan 100 in 2017 demonstrated we were across the issues then, as we are today and until the Government and the Victoria Police start to seriously address what we have raised, in another 10 years the community will still be wondering what happened to one of Australia’s premier Police Forces and the crime rate and general lawlessness of the current crime Tsunamis will make living in this State intolerable both from a cultural and practical perspective.
Some of the articles that spawned PLAN 100..
The policing experiment that caused a crime wave
“Victoria is labouring through a policing experiment where tasking, or management by statistics, is being marketed as “Modern Policing,” but instead of reducing crime, it has dramatically increased it.
Worryingly, there is no guarantee that the ‘Modernising Policing’ tasking experiment will ever work, and, if it doesn’t, then what?
When we find in five years 3,000 extra police are not enough, do we recruit 6,000 to be sure?”
Published December 2016
https://caainc.org.au/the-policing-experiment-that-caused-a-crime-wave/
Act Now or Crime Will Spiral Out of Control in Victoria
“Chairman of the Community Advocacy Alliance and former Chief Commissioner, Kel Glare, said the plan would address rampant violent crime, aggravated burglaries and robberies by youth, car thefts, assaults and the lack of respect for Police and the law in Victoria.
Put simply, if we all don’t act now, crime in this state will continue to spiral out of control, and everyone will be less safe. The reputation of Victoria as a safe state will be trashed.
My colleagues and I didn’t give years of service to policing in this state to see that happen.”
Published April 2017
https://caainc.org.au/act-now-or-crime-will-spiral-out-of-control-in-victoria/
Victoria in serious trouble still
“The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) again warned of the current Crime Tsunami nearly two years ago, and unfortunately, our predictions were accurate.
The CAA further warned that the Pursuit Policies of VicPol would lead to serious consequences, and unfortunately, that prediction was also accurate. The Bourke Street massacre highlighted the folly of current police policies.
We now predict that unless there are major changes to the police philosophy, the Judicial and Penal systems, the Crime rate will not flatten as Community and Police Leaders would try to have you believe, but escalate to unbelievable levels.
As Police and Community leaders search for the slightest positive in the latest crime figures, the reality is, no matter how you cut it or slice it, we are spiralling towards anarchy.”
Published 2017
https://caainc.org.au/686-2/?doing_wp_cron=1777849326.8314599990844726562500
72,000 lost shifts – Police victim blaming
The latest police sick leave figures (HS 30/9/17) are unbelievable and equate to nearly 350 shifts lost per week.
With these sorts of numbers, you would have thought the penny might drop with the Government that VicPol has structural problems and should address those before victim-blaming.
The problem predominantly is the organisation, not the police members.
Teaching senior staff how to help staff is a bit off. Apart from the obvious question of how they became senior staff without this basic management skill, suggests that VicPol wants to dodge the real cause: structural problems.
The Government’s only answer is to recruit more police. When will real action be taken when the lost shifts achieve 100,000?”
Published 2018
https://caainc.org.au/72000-lost-shifts-police-victim-blaming/?
PLAN 100…..
The Plan addressed in particular the three major issues where failure is rife: within VicPol, effectiveness, efficiency, and morale.
These are but three of the pillars of the organisation, and no meaningful effort to at least acknowledge the problem exists, or to address the problems, all that happens is they open another pack of ‘band-aids’ when the pressure is placed on the organisation.
Improving the organisation is also apparently not within the purview of the Police Association (TPAV), who rejected attempts by the CAA to even discuss these issues, albeit that apart from the benefit to the community, the largest group to benefit from the CAA plans are the Police members themselves, a concept that does not appear to light a fire under the Police Association.
This State is facing a November election, and it is the only chance we will have in four years to install a government that will take Policing and Law and Order seriously and do something positive about it.
We have previously acknowledged that Chief Commissioner Mike Bush has a herculean task in making Victoria Police an effective organisation again.
An Independent Law and Order Standing Commission must be established with bipartisan support to oversee all matters concerning Law and Order and Good Governance within Government, and particularly the Criminal Justice system.
Getting an effective and efficient Criminal Justice system that punishes wrongdoers might just give the Victoria Police under Mike Bush the chance to reform.
Although Plan 100 was written ten years ago, it is as relevant today as it was then, and if you are concerned about the way Law and Order is not progressing, in this lawless state, make your views heard by your local member.
You can review Plan 100 by following the link. https://caainc.org.au/plan-100/
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | May 1, 2026 | Illicit Drugs, Library, Media, Politics, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues, Violence
It is now essential that Victoria Police review their operational approach to the prevention and detection of crime.
We accept they are working under staff pressures; however, the time for using that as an excuse has passed.
A St Kilda Chemist was assaulted in his shop in the middle of the day, trying to protect his staff and his property, the shop stock, from a light-fingered, aggressive male many years his junior.
Several things are very disturbing, not least of all, it took twenty-four (24) hours for the police to respond to the 000 calls for help.
That makes the ambulance ramping times look positively rapid in comparison.
But if the police were doing their job well, this incident would probably not have occurred at all, and that is the frustration with the current mindset of policing.
The Chemist shop located in St. Kilda has been targeted on many occasions by apparent drug-affected individuals, over a very long period, and the behaviour necessitates the owners to use 000 very regularly. This was the longest no-show of police, and it was just good luck rather than good police work that the assault did not continue to escalate further.
The injuries sustained by the Chemist are bad enough, but do they have to wait until it is a fatality before the Police respond?
Given the age of the victim, he is extremely lucky not to have suffered fatal one-punch injuries.
The CAA membership is well aware of the trauma associated with a one-punch death as experienced by another of our members, who is a strong advocate for legislative change.

The two owners of the business have made every effort to encourage the police to make their neighbourhood safe for everyone and have been regular attendees at the Police information forums to provide feedback on the issues.
We note that, when interviewed by the media, Charlotte, Russell’s wife, corrected the Secretary of the Police Association, who was claiming the percentage of Police unavailable was much lower than the truth, which is closer to 25%. A very embarrassed Secretary had to admit on live TV that her figures were more accurate. Charlotte is a member of the CAA and actively works for the good of others in her community.
But the situation that they found themselves in is aggravated by the amount of effort the couple put into making St. Kilda a safer place.
VicPol has made as many promises as they have had management turnovers, and each wants to put their own stamp on the territory.
The promise of more patrols (proactive crime-prevention strategies) can happen for short periods if they are lucky, but are generally ineffective, as this incident demonstrates. It begs the question: where was the foot patrol when this incident happened, and why did it take 24 hours for the police to attend?
Had the Police attended when the first alarm was made, it may have prevented the assault.
But if there had been a foot patrol doing its job in the vicinity, then the assault would not have occurred at all.
The answer probably lies with the attitude of local police and their command, with a questionable attitude to preventing crime. They can’t see past reported crime.
They haven’t worked out that they can reduce what may be a serious work overload by reducing crime in the first place.
The numbers game will again be trotted out as a defence. Still, the community is sick of hearing this mantra and wants the Police management to provide leadership and exercise creative strategies to reduce crime.
The available Police resources can be used to maximum efficiency to address problems like this, and there are a plethora of options open to police commanders to use resources more effectively, but little public knowledge that they are even trying.
They just keep playing the same staffing refrain.
The public would accept some problems in resourcing if they are satisfied that management is trying to resolve them, and this hinges on open and frank discussions with the community, not on the traditional excuse mantra.
It looks very much like nothing much will happen until the Chief Commissioner issues directions to achieve the reduced crime environment.
It will need some Police managers to be held to account for failing to manage the volume of reported crime under their geographical area of responsibility due to a lack of proactive measures.
Being held to account and sanctioned would change attitudes overnight for the betterment of the Force, the Police members and the community.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Apr 30, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
What does this phrase really mean?
The phrase “the standard you walk past is the standard you accept” was popularised by the Australian Army Chief, Lieutenant General David Morrison, in 2013. He used it to emphasise that ignoring misconduct or poor behaviour—especially disrespect, bullying, or unethical actions—makes those behaviours seem normal.
At its core, the message is about responsibility, accountability and culture:
-
-
- If you see something wrong and stay silent, you’re helping it continue.
- If you ignore low standards, you lower the standard for everyone.
- If you want a better culture—at work, in society, or at home—you must act when something isn’t right.
This applies to leadership, workplaces, communities, and even personal life.
When leaders or individuals overlook problems, they signal that those problems are acceptable, which can erode trust and create toxic environments. – various sources.
The principles of the phrase can be applied to unacceptable behaviours recently demonstrated at the Box Hill Police Station (One of those not closed, at least at the time of this incident).
A senior member of the CAA had a private cause to visit this Station recently and noticed that three other mature male persons were also waiting for service at the counter.
A Constable was attending to two additional females.
The conversation between the Constable and these women was clearly audible to the gathering, bordering on theatre. It soon became obvious that one of the women, who was showing signs of distress, was reporting a domestic violence matter, and the second woman was her support person.
So far, the situation, although not entirely desirable, was acceptable; however, it went downhill from there.
The Constable delved into the issue in great detail with a series of questions that were both very personal and embarrassing to answer, aggravated by the audience present.
Any respect for the privacy of this alleged victim evaporated.
It was obvious to the CAA member that he was not the only one feeling discomfort at the way this probable victim was being exposed for all to hear. He observed the body language from the other males waiting for service, who also seemed very uncomfortable with the process the female was subjected to.
Even when another female member attended the counter to help those waiting and the CAA member raised the situation with her, she agreed the behaviour was unacceptable and would take it further; however, she did not intervene as the interrogation of the victim continued.
The circumstances and content of the domestic complaint are, by and large, irrelevant to the woman’s privacy and the professionalism of a police member.
The interview should have been conducted privately, not made into a public spectacle.
There is no doubt that the constable should be disciplined based on the information to hand and made an example of.
The greatest concern, however, is that the constable was in a work environment where he believed this type of behaviour was acceptable.
When the issue is formally investigated, and the facts within this report are confirmed, the list of those disciplined will be extensive when the phrase “the standard you walk past is the standard you accept” is applied to this incident.
The role of others and their breaches in order of their culpability are,
- The Station Commander should bear the greatest responsibility for allowing a work environment and culture to evolve where this type of behaviour can be acceptable. The Station OC may not have been aware of the incident, which does not reduce culpability for cultural failings.
- The Local Area Commander for failing to adequately oversee and manage the cultural failings of a Police Station where behaviours like this are acceptable, and in particular a Station where the officer is located. Whether the LAC was on duty or not is irrelevant.
- The on-duty supervisor for not performing adequate supervision of staff. The Shift Supervisor must be aware of what is going on with all staff at all times, otherwise they can’t supervise.
- The Policewoman for failing to take action or seeking out a supervisor to intervene and facilitate a private location for the continuation of the interview of the female complainant,
- The Constable responsible.
A prima facie case against all the members engaging in conduct they displayed is likely to bring Victoria Police into disrepute or diminish public confidence in it, and is a defined breach of discipline under Section 125 of the Victoria Police Act 2013, which can attract severe penalties if found guilty.
The proliferation of domestic issues foisted onto the police is a major contributor to members downgrading the importance of these issues to generally not much more than annoyance, which is not an excuse for a professional Force.
But this may highlight an urgent need for the police, in domestic incidents, to further refine their role to keep the peace and, where necessary, to investigate to determine whether any party has committed an offence and to bring the suspect before the Court.
The welfare of the parties, victims or otherwise, and determining which party is at fault, or trying to adjudicate a solution, is not a police role, but the Courts
Other well-qualified individuals employed by the government would best serve these extended functions.
The solution is fairly simple.
The (original) model developed by the Crisis Assessment and Treatment Team (CATT) used in the Domestic space would alleviate a major workload issue for the police, freeing them up to attend to other matters requiring their attention.
It is well known that the most effective intervention for behavioural issues is an early one.
The Critical CATT Teams concept, which would translate to DVCATT, would, apart from reducing risks to victims, also allow the welfare of the families involved to be managed in real time, rather than through a future referral, reducing tensions.
Additionally, a fair proportion of the administrative workload created for Police attending DV incidents could be covered by the DVCATT system.
The interrelationship between the roles of the Police and DVCATT is a matter for the establishment of protocols.
For every DV incident allocated to a Police Unit, the same allocation must be made to the DVCATT to attend in a timely manner while Police are on scene.
This system will not only benefit the police but also the participants and families where DV incidents occur.
Having professionals attend in addition to the police in the first instance will most likely reduce the amount of DV requiring intervention by authorities, a win for everyone, including the broader community and the cost of DVCATT development and implementation will be offset by Police efficiencies, a dual benefit for the State.
A cost-benefit analysis on police overtime and administration hours alone would well cover this initiative.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Apr 27, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
We would argue that both are critical because the escalation in crime rates is directly linked to the Judiciary’s performance and effectiveness.
Linking the crime rate is, heaven forbid, akin to making the Judicial fraternity accountable and providing a measure by which their performance can be assessed, both as a profession and individually.
The figures produced by the Herald Sun on the 25th of April should be a wake-up call to the Judiciary to lift their game in both quantitative and qualitative terms.
“There are currently an estimated 489 judicial officers and VCAT members, according to Court Services Victoria’s latest annual report, including more than 130 magistrates and 70 County Court judges, where the backlogs are growing fastest.
The growing backlog crisis is most pronounced in the County Court, where the number of pending criminal matters ballooned by 603 to 3000 between December 2024 and December 2025.
In the Magistrates’ Court, 3404 criminal cases were added to the waitlist over the same period, bringing to 65,788 the number of matters waiting to be finalised.”
The most damning statistic is the number of cases that remain unfinalised: 65,788, which equates to 134 unfinalised cases for each jurist – they need to put more time into their job and improve their decision-making efficiency dramatically.
We suggest that, unless radical changes are made, this number will grow to a level impossible to rein in.
Simply more Judges will help, but may exacerbate the problem as well, particularly if the new Judges are as ineffective as those already serving.
This number alone shows the adverse impact on Victims, offenders, and the community overall, and addressing this issue will go a long way to unclogging the Court System.
In the Herald Sun article, the Leader of the Opposition, Jess Wilson, announced that she was open to appointing new judges, which is a positive step toward resolving the current imbroglio. But the rationale is somewhat constrained, and the current problems are not quantitative alone.
The government claims in the same article that,
“The government has repeatedly said higher court volumes were not a failure, but a result of new laws introduced to crack down on crime.”
This claim may have some basis in fact, but if the ‘crime crack down’ is not applied throughout the Legal system, then the crackdown is a myth.
But the big question is how and what needs to be addressed.
The community is sick and tired of offenders who Police arrest for crime being granted bail on what would seem the flimsiest of excuses, only to be in the headlines within days, arrested for more of the continuation of their original criminal behaviours, and in some reports, the behaviour has escalated.
Anybody who follows the media reporting on the performance of the judiciary would easily conclude that some of the Legal brethren would rather play at being Social Justice warriors rather than administering the Law as it was intended by our legislators.
This churlish behaviour brings disrespect to all the judiciary, many of whom do not deserve that ridicule.
The, what some would argue, draconian Laws and processes where sanctions can be imposed without a trial in the domestic violence space have been largely accepted by the community. It may be time to look at taking a similar approach to crime more broadly, with built-in safeguards to stem the tide, as current strategies are not working.
This revolving-door mindset that the Judiciary sponsors must be challenged, and the best way to do that is to enshrine accountability for judges who grant bail and/or, upon conviction, allow perpetrators to re-enter the community without penalty for their indiscretions.
The vast majority of Juveniles appearing before a court for a crime see walking out at the end of the hearing as beating it. All the Court processes and lectures delivered from the bench are just white noise to be tolerated
Administrative penalties don’t cut it and are interpreted as non-penalties.
A perpetrator’s refusal to accept accountability for their indiscretions is a major factor in recidivism, so the Courts must accept responsibility for imposing sanctions that do not achieve the accountability objective.
Why should a Judicial Officer continue to serve in a Court Division where they constantly have offenders reoffending after conviction?
That surely must be a legitimate measure of the Jurist’s performance.
Further, the caseload of each Jurist must be measured and compared with their peers to assess the Jurist’s quantitative performance.
It is also relevant to measure the quantum of cases awaiting finalisation by each jurist so that ditherers can be identified and guided to better performance.
The CAA has long argued that a Judicial Review Committee should be created to oversee the Judiciary’s performance and that the Committee should include non-lawyers among its members.
As to the political bias of Jurist, we are not aware that it is a problem per se; however, there are serious problems in the Legal processes where important cases are not finalised, and perpetrators can escape prosecution. That is called ‘corruption.’
We would argue that there is a proliferation of matters that reek of political bias, and that the bias is generated not by the judiciary but within the Law Department itself.
The matters that have been at the forefront over the last decade include
- Slug Gate
- The Gobbo affair
- Politicians’ Travel Rorts
- Bike Boy
- Branch Stacking and Misuse of Public Resources (Operation Watts)
- Hotel Quarantine Failures and Accountability Gaps (COVID‑19
- Improper Influence over Public Contracts (IBAC – Operation Daintree)
- “Red Shirts” Affair – Use of Taxpayer Funds for Campaigning
- Planning, Developer Donations, and Political Access (Operation Sandon).
The one thing these items have in common is the dearth of culprits who have not been held to account; we are not talking about some junior participant; the architects of these rorts are the ones who need to be held to account. If that starts to happen, there will be an immediate lift in performance within the legal system.
The behaviour of those responsible for this disgraceful approach to Law and Order, where some are untouched by prosecution, sends an unequivocal message to all those Victorians with a criminal bent: crime pays.
One standard for one section of the community and a different standard for others is a recipe for failure of Law and Order.
There are other contributors, and a pattern seems to have emerged across the decade of:
- Politicisation of public administration
- Weak accountability for ministerial advisers
- Over‑centralisation of power
- Limited anti‑corruption jurisdiction and enforcement.
Victoria seems to have evolved a class of oligarchs similar to those in some places in Europe, the untouchables, and this must be curtailed.
Coupled with reviewing the Judicial performance, these areas are in critical need of attention.
Addressing these issues, where historical matters at last find resolution and those responsible are held to account, is imperative.
Making those who serve the community accountable has to be the State’s priority, and for that, we need to rely on the politicians.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Apr 17, 2026 | Library, Politics, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues
One Policing art that has been disappearing over the last decade has now reached a point where it poses a real and ever-present danger to Police on the beat, extending to Police mobile patrol units and is reflected in the crime statistics that show clearly that the proactive function of police patrols is ineffective.
The Art of the Police foot patrol has all but disappeared, replaced by a quantitative approach that is endangering the lives of the police involved.
Central to this new, increased danger is the loss of the skill of Situational Awareness.
Today, you are more likely to see a gaggle of police walking along a city street than police members on patrol. Still, the gaggle is in response to a perceived need by management, mistakenly believing that numbers create a deterrent rather than an individual well-trained police member properly performing Patrol with well-tuned situational awareness and community engagement skills.
To increase the deterrent impact, if there are four or five members detailed for patrol, they must be spread out to cover greater areas, and that is effective deterrent Policing, metaphorically a police presence on every corner.
An effect achieved by properly trained supervisors.
It is surprising that the Police Association (TPAV) is not very vocal on this issue; in fact, their silence is deafening. The skill of patrolling directly relates to Police members’ safety, an issue we presume is of critical interest to the TPAV.
What we don’t know is whether these patrol skill deficits are a lack of training of members and or supervisors, or just the easy way out for supervisors.
We would hope this is not Force policy; we credit the Police administration as being smarter than that.
What you will see with these skill deficits is police engaged with each other, perhaps talking about babies, station gossip, or football, who knows, but what we do know is that this practice is very dangerous. These groups, inwardly focused, are a bigger target for terrorists or organised crime gangs, or rogue individuals, and these risks should not be discounted.
The gaggle phenomenon should be known as the ‘non-patrol ’.
The members in conversation have no Situational Awareness, so they will not see danger coming.
You can’t dodge a bullet (metaphorically) if you don’t see when it is coming.
In this era of heightened risk of terrorism, the Police groups make easy targets all bunched together out in the open, walking at a leisurely pace, not concentrating on their function, is a recipe for disaster in lost Police lives.
One of the most dangerous activities reported to us has been groups of members convening a meeting, perhaps by a supervisor, in public places with their backs to where any threat may eventuate.
Sitting Ducks is an appropriate analogy.
Probably the misguided two-up policy of years ago has never been fully corrected.
Policy Introduced in 2015:
Near-total ban on solo public policing.
Now:
Two-up is strongly enforced for high-risk and Highway Patrol duties. Multiple exemptions based on risk assessment, location, urgency, and staffing realities—functionally a risk-managed policy, not a universal rule.
The problem is that members have become entrenched in the need for the company rather than ensuring operational effectiveness.
And while on members’ safety, supervisors must intervene to manage gawkers at incident scenes.
Far too often, we see in media footage at incident scenes, gawkers standing around, apparently enjoying the event, and we are not talking about the public, but other police.
Gawking, not keeping an eye on the background to protect themselves and the members directly involved, must be addressed before any real harm occurs, apart from being unprofessional.
It will take strong leadership to turn this around. Something we are confident Chief Commissioner Bush could provide.
It does not seem logical that a well-trained police officer cannot undertake foot patrol or mobile patrols one-up.
If there are two members available, one should patrol either side of the street, multiplying the visible Police presence.
This allows for community engagement, the most potent proactive Police function. And when it comes to mobile patrols, the same logic should apply.
When a supervisor is tasking their shift, vehicle availability is a critical consideration.
It seems illogical to have one or two vehicles two up when the Station has other vehicles idle.
Three or four vehicles, one up, are far more effective than the apparent holy grail that Police vehicles must be two-up.
The concept of an observer in a Police vehicle in practise means the passenger has eyes down on a phone or other electronic device, making the role of observer moot.
The role of the supervisor is to manage all vehicle crews, so the allocation of resources to a public call may require two or three, or more, one-up vehicles to respond.
Often, as the case may be, once the matter is under physical control, resources can be peeled off, making patrol more efficient in any geographical area, reducing initial response times and increasing patrol visibility, thereby reducing crime. On many occasions, leaving just one member to complete the administration.
The two-up policy, even though it has been diluted since its inception, must be rescinded so lame-duck excuses cannot be used to maintain the status quo.
Although introduced as a safety issue, the risk to members has not diminished since its introduction but has increased.
More members have paid the ultimate sacrifice during the two-up period than at any other time, including multiple deaths not seen since the Kelly ambush of 1878 at Stringy Bark Creek near Mansfield.
The most effective safety strategy to reduce fatalities and injuries to Police in the Patrol environment is Situational Awareness, but what is it, and why is it so critical for Police?
Simply put, it is the art of looking at the bush and seeing the trees.
Ask anybody to look at the traffic and explain what they see. Usually, the answer is a lot of Cars.
Ask a trained Police member what they see, and they will report the types of vehicles and any obvious anomalies, such as passenger-side windows wound down when all other vehicles have them closed, erratic driving, avoiding being blocked in, a very young driver with similarly aged occupants in a high-end car.
And the real giveaway is that all occupants are paying attention to the police vehicle.
All these things, and more, justify checking out the vehicle.
A trained member on patrol will engage with the public, but, more importantly, will focus on the faces of every individual they pass. They are looking for body language that may indicate unlawful intent.
These are just a small part of the many aspects of Situational Awareness.
None of this happens when a gaggle of Police, or even just two, stroll around, talking amongst themselves.
We are confident that the Chief Commissioner is across this issue, and we hope, for the benefit of members, that the Police Association becomes proactive in this approach, given the benefits to members.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Apr 14, 2026 | Library, Politics, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues
The announcement in the Herald Sun, 12th of April 2026, ‘Victoria is haemorrhaging police officers’, by the Leader of the Opposition, Jess Wilson, to increase the Police numbers by 3000, is very welcome news indeed. Long-suffering Victorians can at least have hope that, with a change in government, the issue of law and order, particularly the Police capacity, in this once fine State would be seriously addressed. At last, our safety is a priority.
What concerns us most is the methodology the Opposition proposes to achieve its targets.
Establishing overseas recruiting centres and the associated marketing to attract recruits could be a very expensive option, especially if no suitable ‘sunset’ clause for this process is included.
It also has the potential of the Force, believing the problem is fixed and fails to address the problems within, the root cause of the current issues.
It is worrying that no real effort has ever been made to recruit Victorians.
It is true that well-trained personnel from the countries listed and interstate will help, but it is not the solution; rather, it is a welcome stopgap.
The problem, as we understand it, is that there are plenty of Police applicants; it is the training and processing that is the bottleneck.
The CAA has raised this issue before and proposed a solution.
The first step before we head overseas is to examine and review the selection process of Recruits to ensure they’re fit for purpose from selection to retirement.
Failing to do that adequately is kicking the can down the road.
Poor recruitment selection today creates the problems of tomorrow.
The epidemic of resignations as Police exit in alarming numbers is more than likely to be, in large part at least, the manifestation of poor selections in the past as much as poor management today. Perhaps focusing on a quantitative rather than a qualitative outcome is the problem.
It is critical that applicants are screened more effectively to minimise the risk of non-physical injuries during their service, and investment in this area would be money well spent, provided the outcomes are monitored.
It would also be a good investment to properly examine the exit avalanche to identify causes and address those. Failing to do that will only mean the causes are still there, and the problem will reignite at some point in the future.
One of the major failures is that VicPol has outsourced recruitment application training, so the potential recruits are not being evaluated on their merits but on a taught response from independent contractors.
That is a major recruiting flaw, regardless of how dedicated the applicant trainers may be.
Outsourcing this process is the result of the Force seeking greater efficiency, rather than understanding that effectiveness should never be compromised for efficiency.
We are advised that a potential recruit may need to pay up to $2,000 to complete the application process and training before assessment. That has to be a major disincentive for many suitable people considering a career with Victoria Police.
Victoria Police must take back control of this process and be responsible for all aspects of it. It seems disingenuous to ask people to join and pay for the privilege of being considered.
The Force must also review management accountability, not only for staff functional performance in the field but also for their ability to deal with the non-physical stress that the police service exposes them to.
In summary, there is a need for overseas recruiting, but recruiting in Victoria should be the first priority, as it will be substantially cheaper, enabling world-class training to be developed and implemented across the Force to improve the organisation’s overall performance and the conditions in which personnel are forced to work.
We have seen in recent years vast improvements in the employment conditions of Police in this state, but this has been overshadowed by the large numbers leaving the organisation. So simply improving tangible benefits of themselves is not the answer without the non-tangible benefits being developed.
Although we do not begrudge any improvements, given the conditions that police work under, the provision of new buildings, better equipment, and improved conditions can be counterproductive to the organisation’s efficacy.
Tangible rewards do not replace effective management; however, rewards used judiciously may solve the current problems.
Rather than spend millions overseas, why not invest in the current staff to slow the retention exodus?
Retention bonuses will go a long way to stem that tide and encourage others to join. It would also attract interstate serving Police seeking a reward for service.
Additionally, this scheme, which can be spread over many budgets, would be easier to maintain.
A bonus system starting with Graduation, then two years of service, five years, then ten-year increments would overtly reward service and discourage those considering an exit plan from Policing.
Investing in the current members, showing appreciation for their work, can be a cost-effective strategy as the scheme has many attractions, particularly if the bonus is linked to performance.
It would be disheartening for hardworking members to see lazy, incompetent members rewarded simply for turning up for work.
Senior Police and political leaders should have a look at the Hawthorne experiment undertaken by Elton Mayo, although it was many years ago; it is as relevant today as it was then and relates to Policing, as is currently evident throughout the Force.
The Hawthorne experiments at Western Electric’s Hawthorne Works plant demonstrated that worker productivity increased not only because of physical conditions (such as salary, leave and other conditions) but also because workers felt valued when observed and given special attention, a phenomenon known as the Hawthorne effect. Led by Elton Mayo, the studies highlighted the importance of social relations, employee morale, and management attention over strict physical working conditions.
By all means, we encourage overseas and interstate recruiting of serving Police officers as a short-term fix, but what is desperately needed is a serious effort to recruit locally and retain existing staff.
We would like to be assured that if the Opposition wins government, they can walk and chew gum simultaneously.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Apr 7, 2026 | Library, Politics, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues, Violence
With all the boo-hoo-hah about our wonderful city and how it is being overrun with druggies and the homeless, it has taken Steve Price, a Melbourne Herald Sun journalist, to really nail the issue and perhaps indirectly provide a solution.
Steve recently got himself down to the alleged epicentre of the Melbourne problem to see first-hand what is going on.
This was what gave his article (Herald Sun Saturday 4th April 2006) real authenticity and demonstrated to decision-makers that they should also get off their butts and go down and get firsthand experience.
Then we might get some strategies and decisions that actually work.
“A couple of weeks ago, during mid-morning on Elizabeth St, a confrontation between a couple of police officers and three obviously drug-affected people outside a liquor store had a disturbing outcome.
The three had decided paying for booze wasn’t necessary, so they simply walked out of the shop with any expensive alcohol they could lay their hands on.
Sadly, for them, there were two police on foot patrol right out front. One of the three had already collapsed onto the pavement and was swigging away at whatever she had stolen, one of the others – a bloke – was shirtless, clutching a bottle along with his mate.
This was midmorning in the centre of Melbourne at a renowned hot spot for the homeless and drug-affected zombies that the Melbourne City Council claims they are cleaning up.
What happened next, though, shows there is more than one way to solve a crime problem.”
To avoid confronting this issue, those responsible jump to the avoidance fallback, with great enthusiasm, ‘this is a Community Health problem’. Effectively diverting the focus from the reality that this problem is primarily one of Law and Order, the health component, although important, is secondary.
First and foremost, the community leaders need to accept that there is a problem and that none of the current strategies is working.
Moreover, the problem is not isolated to Elizabeth Street but also affects other areas in the city, inner-city, metropolitan, and rural areas. In other words, it is a Statewide problem.
It is also arguably a National problem; however, shifting responsibility to the National approach only ensures that nothing effective will be done, other than blame shifting.
Recognising the depth and breadth of the issue is but part one, and no solution can be achieved if those who are our community leaders don’t accept reality but remain blissfully oblivious in their comfort zone of denial.
But back to Steve Price’s work.
“As I stood listening to the exchange between the police officers and the thieving druggies, I was amazed when one of the uniformed officers got into the face of the two that were standing and pointed toward a stationary tram at the stop on the corner of Elizabeth and Flinders streets. He told the pair, “Go and get on that tram right now, and catch it to the end of the line and f— off out of here”.
Tactically, not strictly out of the Victoria Police handbook and not doing much for the idea that if you are a homeless druggie, you shouldn’t be stealing from Liquorland, but it solved the immediate problem.
The moral of the story is that despite all the promises from the state government and Melbourne City Council, they still haven’t addressed the issues haunting Melburnians, desperate to claim their once great city back. Broken promise after broken promise and useless media spin-driven solutions are a joke and simply don’t achieve anything”..
The actions of the Police member involved were laudable, exercising his lawful discretionary power in that it immediately resolved a problem, but unfortunately, only relocated it, albeit temporarily. We cannot help but wonder whether the Police member was unduly influenced, given that, in the current administrative climate, charging these thieves was a waste of time.
Which raises the issue of whether it is right both morally and legally for the three druggies not to face court for their thievery.
The theft is distinct from their drug sobriety and must be treated independently, and the impact of drugs on their behaviour must be ignored; drug addicts must not be allowed to blame drugs for their crimes.
Deal with any criminal matters as the priority and then deal with their health issue as a result of their poor life choices separately.
The Courts are not the referral point for treatment, as that lies with Corrections.
In the unlikely event that they are jailed.
The Courts are responsible for instilling accountability. Corrections are responsible for rehabilitation and referring the addict’s health issues to the responsible authority, Health.
Being under the influence of any addiction must never be an excuse for criminal activity.
We have no hope of resolving this blight on society unless the Police can do their job and the Courts do theirs, and once those two sectors are working, then the issue of dealing with the perpetrators’ health can be addressed.
The health approach hasn’t worked and is not likely to, no matter what the apologists for drug addicts committing crimes may think and, unfortunately, espouse.
Compassion for addicts/users deprives those innocent of any wrongdoing, the victims, of justice. It’s the Victims who deserve compassion from the courts, not the perpetrator of a crime.
The solution, as in the case witnessed by Steve Price, has become clear: the health argument has failed, and the only option is a law-and-order approach.
Unfortunately, the police member exercising his discretion failed the sector of the community most impacted by this activity, the victims.
The Police must be encouraged to charge any person associated with the drug scourge for even what is considered a minor crime. If they commit an offence, they must be arrested (assuming there is a power of arrest for that offence) and brought before a court.
If the offence is proven, then the Courts must be directed not to consider their sobriety at the time of the offence as a mitigating factor in sentencing.
This strategy will imbue accountability in the users, the lack of which is a major contributor to the drug epidemic.
Building up convictions for minor matters will eventually end up with the addict being sentenced to prison, if the Courts are doing their job, instead of trying to be social engineers.
This social engineering approach generally leads to failure, failure for the victim and the addict.
Unless there are consequences for unacceptable (criminal) behaviour, there is no motivation for the addicts to change their behaviour or seek help, remembering that they are as addicted to the drug lifestyle as much as their drug of choice.
Tackling the lifestyle by instilling accountability, there is a chance of substantial change for the better, and health outcomes will become effective.
Well done, Steve.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Mar 23, 2026 | Corruption, Library, Politics, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues
While Police Command and the Police Association dance around each other, trying to score points, the crime rate is either stabilising (not according to the statistics) or that an injection of 1,500 replacement members will solve the problem.
It would be nice, and good for policing and the community if these two would at least adopt a common approach rather than lock heads. That approach does not provide solutions, just more grief.
The Herald Sun report on the 20th of March 2026 exposed this imbroglio.
If anyone thinks an injection of 1500 will solve the problem, they need to take a serious look at what they are saying. At current rates, the replacements will take longer than many of us will live.
At the accelerated rate of 70 + per annum, over attrition, the shortfall in Police graduating from training will be reached in about 20 years, provided attrition does not continue to accelerate.
Given the current realities of policing in this State, the chances of stabilisation are extremely low.
20 years is a long time to wait for sufficient police to attend to your problem.
Shortening courses is a band-aid fix, as less police training translates into poor police performance. If these few weeks were scuppered so easily, why were police trained to the full measure for so many years?
Probably because the Force collectively thought it was necessary to produce effective, efficient police. Surely it wasn’t being done for the hell of it.
You can see the claims coming thick and fast in the future, where members blame the lack of training that caused their mental health to deteriorate.
Additionally, VicPol’s argument that the crime rate will plateau is unrealistic, because how would they know unless their crystal ball works better than ours?
Telling the public that the Police Stations shuttered across the Mornington Peninsula has limited effect because victims ringing 000 is arrant rubbish, as there is no evidence that Stations weren’t being contacted before they were closed.
The problem with the Station closures is that they are misleading the public, as the majority of those stations are actively operational; they just don’t provide a forward-facing inquiry counter.
That people do not attend Police Stations during certain periods is well known, and closing the inquiry counter during these periods is reasonable, but a 24-hour approach results in the Force failing dramatically in an important function of Service delivery.
One of the most outstanding and embarrassing claims attributed to Deputy Commissioner Hill in this Herald article justifying the station closures was –
“and (officers) weren’t answering the telephone, because no one was ringing.” ‘Doh,’
It may well be more accurate to say that nobody answers the telephone, so nobody rings.
The Police Advice Line (not operated by Police)and the 000, also non-police systems, have major service delivery failures, frustrating callers. Police simply supervising call takers is not enough.
Add to that Crime Stoppers, which seems never to provide callers with feedback, and the whole of the forces and allied communications systems need to be reviewed and updated to be fit for purpose, whether you’re the caller or the recipient.
There is a desperate need for a change in attitude within the Force Command.
The Force is there to serve the community, not the other way round.
As to what can be done.
The Police Association and the Force need to be on the same page and come up with solutions, not more rhetoric, butting heads, and blame shifting.
Here are but a few matters to consider.
a) G-Tag
The spike in stolen vehicles would be dramatically reduced by implementing the CAA G-Tag project. A pilot run some years ago that failed because the onus was put on the car owners, and the police abandoned their role again, and the Pilot did not follow the G-Tag proposal.
b) Training efficiency
Training could be accelerated by accommodating training off campus from the Police Academy. Recruits start for a number of weeks at the Academy, then move to an off-campus facility for theory training, returning in the last fortnight of their training at the Academy and for graduation. When operated properly, this initiative could triple the number of recruits processed each year, and there would be no need to reduce training timeframes. Judicious planning may be required to coordinate this scheme, but the outputs justify the work.
c) Reduce Night shifts.
To alleviate personnel shortages, each member of every Task Force or other specialist group should remain on their station-of-origin roster for the night shift. With fewer night shifts, members’ overall welfare will improve, with little impact on the groups from which this resource is sourced. Additionally, the Task Force or Special Duties members can keep in touch with operations at their station of origin.
d) Administration efficiency
The streamlining of administration plaguing operational members is being addressed; however, the members are generally not aware of progress. Reporting on what is being done and accountability to front-line members will give them hope that things will improve. Reversing the negative effects of admin overload, particularly if a reporting mechanism includes opportunities for members to provide feedback, will help develop members’ ownership of the changes. Accountability to frontline members by those charged with fixing the problem will expedite results and improve overall morale.
e) Increase operational staff by 10,000 days.
Another mechanism to improve staffing levels is to introduce a leave buy-back scheme. All members currently enjoy substantial leave entitlements, whether they are working in the frontline or elsewhere. A voluntary scheme available only to frontline police, if it attracted 500 participants for four weeks, would create an additional 10,000 on-duty workdays per annum.
This scheme would be attractive to members trying to get into the property market, recovering from a financial hardship, or just the added income as a valuable tool to improve their lifestyle. A voluntary scheme such as this will be the most cost-effective way to increase the Force’s capacity in the short term.
f) Role of leading Senior Constables.
Our understanding of the Leading Senior Constable (LSC) was akin to that of a Master Police Patrolman (MPP), experienced and equipped, capable of any police operational undertaking, including the more difficult or complex tasks than the rest—a cut above the others.
They do, however, seem to be treated as just another member and their skills are not recognised.
LSC’s should be capable of one-up patrols as first responders to determine the additional needs required for the reported incident.
One key area that would have an immediate impact is the reintroduction of one-up Highway patrols, doubling the number of Police Highway vehicles on the road.
If implemented, it would increase the number of patrolling vehicles by a factor of two across the Force.
g) Two-up patrols
Rescinding the two-up patrol mandate of 2015, based on a heightened terrorism threat, was, in hindsight, an overreaction that has limped along, reducing the force’s capacity to respond to community needs for a decade. This policy coincides with the rapid escalation of crime over the last decade. Halving Police patrols was a major contributor to the crime spike, which would go a long way to impacting crime and the road toll.
The instruction has been debunked as a safety issue for police, as more Police have been slain in that decade in incidents involving multiple officers than any recorded death of a Police member working alone. Public records indicate eight Police deaths since the policy was introduced, none of them working one up. Therefore, it can be safer for members to work one-up. The additional Police freed up should be detailed to other vehicles (There seems to be no lack of them as you drive by Stations and see police cars parked doing nothing for hours) or other patrol functions to increase the Police presence by 100%.
h) Police proactive youth programs
If you want to make inroads into the crime statistics, then police working with children in targeted areas is the only strategy that will work. It’s no good relying on the Court system, and a piecemeal approach is problematic.
A revamped and targeted Police Schools program where Police are actively involved in Schools at the age target level of year 7.
Part of the industrial action currently being undertaken by Teachers and Principals is the danger they regularly face. A Police presence in schools will alleviate some of these concerns and make schools a safer place for staff; students will also benefit from a safe environment that promotes better learning outcomes. All contributing to a reduced crime rate.
The in-school work of the police, apart from building bridges on a personal level with students, is to deal with, assist, and guide any child who is heading toward a future in crime. What won’t work is random school attendance for students to play sports with the police. Perhaps enjoyable for both, but effectiveness is severely limited. A more formal approach with structured learning, however, would be a more effective use of Police resources.
It is time the pendulum swings to a proactive youth focus and stop blaming everybody else for the crime surge when creative planning would address the problem overnight. It’s called Crime Prevention.
These initiatives would go a long way toward creating a more functional Force, and the 1,500– 2,000 police officer number shortfall, depending on who you talk to, could be largely addressed by these initiatives.
And, more importantly, take pressure off members, slowing the attrition rate as the job becomes more result-driven, increasing job satisfaction.
For the Force and the Association to have a public spat is not helpful to either side.
The recent matter we became involved in with a member being forced back to the frontline with a serious health issue should never have happened, but shows that the Force has a long way to go to ensure the welfare of its police members and the Police Association must review their function, given those who helped the sick member, sought our help rather than the Association is embarrassing.
The welfare of Police must be the highest priority for both the Force and the Association.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Mar 22, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized, Victoria Police Issues
If “service efficiency” is relevant to how well VP trains its members, and “service effectiveness/delivery” relates to how well those members do the job they have been trained to do, it seems to me that there is a loss of memory and a big hole in the thinking of the senior VP management presently concerned.
Consider the older methods of training, way back before the rubbish about worrying how efficient the Instructional members of VP and the many public servants doing the training are, in turning out “street police” – what matters is the fact that police turned up to do whatever job was necessary. NOTE THAT – enough police turned up to do whatever work was needed at the point of intersection with the public. There were just about enough trained and operational members to cover the needs of the jobs.
Let’s go back to the training at the Academy about 1970: when I did it, it was twenty straight live-in weeks at the St. Kilda Road Depot. In those 20 weeks, we were SATURATED in POLICE work, behaviour, experiences, laws and structure – nothing else! With the two limited “outsiders” exceptions for Social Studies and Typing instructors, the only people we dealt with were POLICE members, all of whom were senior in rank and experience to us trainees. Nietzsche said, “What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger”, and that was appropriate when the POLICE Depot was active.
We learnt only from POLICE persons, thus we knew and learnt only POLICE behaviours – there were NO outside opinions from biased Government-body “teachers” or other politically-motivated do-gooder opinions to change or challenge proper POLICE learning behaviours and beliefs.
Therefore, POLICE recruits graduating from the Depot acted and thought like POLICE. At the Depot, the Squad Law Instructor was God, and from him, [a carefully-selected and very experienced, properly-trained POLICEMAN], we learnt the LAW and POLICE beliefs, and were examined on our knowledge depth, and breadth of subjects, many times during those twenty hard weeks.
Then we went out, mostly to POLICE Stations, and learnt more the hard way from our superiors in rank and experience, on how to do the job properly. AND in two years’ time, we went back to the Depot to do what was known as RETENTION – many more weeks of POLICE learning, instruction, and knowledge updating, and exams, to make sure we were really doing well enough to be kept on as REAL POLICE, and if we passed, we were confirmed as POLICE!
I would argue strongly that, unlike the “woke” ideas currently used, this idea and system turned out REAL POLICE!
BUT in later years, training moved to Glen Waverley, and the learning system changed a lot.
Firstly, it went over to a program called PCETS or Probationary Constable Extended Training Scheme – that was the start of VP going downhill, because by then, non-police “outsiders” were brought in to “teach” recruits, and thus the POLICE attitude was beginning to be lost!
Members being produced from then on were not really POLICE; mostly they were nice, kind persons trained to help little old ladies across the pedestrian crossing, and to speak politely and kindly to motorists, and were also hatless persons wearing irregular or poor uniform clothing standards who sometimes walked down the street, whilst not looking at anyone! (a euphemism for foot patrol)
Being nice to people was more important than being an actual POLICE member, and operational performance figures, even before the change of this Century, began to show this. The job kept slipping downhill… and has kept on digging downwards since then. It may not have reached the bottom yet!
Hard, efficient work by some police members wanting to be POLICE has plainly been affected, even negated, at all levels since then by poor VP management not biting back. This has allowed interference by Legal persons and the media, and allowed Court rules to prosper fully on the side of offenders.
Hamstrung and frightened police, caused by obstruction, negative mobile phones, and media interference that is everywhere at public demonstrations, have themselves added to the widespread weight dragging current VP members down.
Internal low-grade support from self-aggrandising VP management and gutless operational supervisors has limited and worsened the abilities of operational members. Lowered VP standards of recruitment acceptances, TAFE and other non-police outside study and examinations, external video and phone influencing, TV and print media interference, even writing “Police” on vehicle doors instead of “POLICE”, and political interference affecting police recruits, have all been allowed by senior VP management to drag REAL POLICING down to the low stage VP now is!
Back about the late 1990s, the print media in general, video influencers, TV media and the general public had absolutely no say or effect in POLICE training. A loud and blunt return to those rules and behaviours might just return VP to the way it needs to be to do the policing job properly. Just as it’s taken years for police to dig and slide down to the poor standard VP has now reached, sadly, it will take years to improve and repair, assuming CCP BUSH is left alone to do his job, and that he actually has the capability to renew VP.
No longer is it the once-proud Victoria Police Force – and until it’s repaired, it can only be known as Victoria Police SERVICE!
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Mar 19, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
A few days ago, the Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) received information that a Victoria Police member of over nineteen years’ service was facing a life-threatening illness.
As a result, she had been afforded the grace of being excused from operational duties, which would have jeopardised her ongoing treatment.
This compassionate decision was overturned, and the member was placed back on the streets, putting her at substantial risk and interfering with her medical treatment.
The CAA contacted the Chief Commissioner’s Office seeking a review of this decision.
In fairness, it is believed that local Officers were considering the merits of that decision.
On March 16 the station received an unannounced visit from Chief Commissioner Mike Bush. CCP Bush had a protracted discussion with the member concerned and promptly reaffirmed the decision not to return her to operational duties. He also called those on the station together and demanded that this member receive every assistance and consideration in an act of compassion that does him great credit.
Bush’s actions were greatly appreciated by the affected member and sent a clear message to the decision makers who put her back on the street.
That the CCP found time in his busy schedule to take an interest in a single member shows he regards his members as individuals and not just numbers on a roster.
The CAA applauds CCP Bush for his humanity and common sense in intervening and further strengthens our view that Victoria Police is now in good hands.
CCP Bush is the real deal.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Mar 18, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
A byproduct of the shortfall in Police numbers, estimated at 1500, is saving the Government approximately $434 m in sworn police employees’ costs per annum.
- All in cost per sworn officer (organisation-wide total expenses ÷ sworn FTE)
≈ $289,800 per officer per year.
Calculation uses Victoria Police’s 2024–25 total expenses of $4.610 b and sworn FTE of 15,909. [police.vic.gov.au], [police.vic.gov.au]
- Personnel component only (employee expenses ÷ sworn FTE)
≈ $230,600 per officer per year.
(Employee expenses: $3.668 b). [police.vic.gov.au], [police.vic.gov.au]
You don’t have to be a mathematical genius to understand what is going on.
Add to that that the population of Victoria has increased by over 640k, dramatically diluting the overall ratio of Police to population.
This is clearly one of the drivers for the crime surge – there are not enough police to do the job.
Available Official Population Data
When you review the Budget allocated to Victoria Police since 2020, you will see a failure to keep pace with inflation, severely hampering the Force’s ability to provide optimal service and retain staff. Calculating the Annual budgets,
Annual budgets (A$ billions)
| Financial year |
Budget (allocation) |
Actual output appropriations |
Source(s) |
| 2020–21 |
3.787 (original BP3 budget) |
4.089 |
Budget Portfolio Outcomes table shows “Output appropriations – Original Budget: 3,787,302 ($’000); Actual: 4,088,960 ($’000)” [police.vic.gov.au] |
| 2021–22 |
3.7 (published budget) |
~4.083 |
Budget stated in the Annual Plan 2021–22 (“published budget of $3.7 billion”); BPO workbook shows actual output appropriations ≈ 4,082,978 ($’000) and confirms prior year 4,088,960 for 2020–21 [police.vic.gov.au], [content.po…vic.gov.au] |
| 2022–23 |
— |
4.150 |
2022–23 Budget Portfolio Outcomes workbook shows actual output appropriations ≈ 4,150,233 ($’000) [police.vic.gov.au] |
| 2023–24 |
4.128 (total output cost budget) |
— |
Victoria Police Annual Report 2023–24 (“received a total output cost budget of $4.128 billion in 2023–24”) [police.vic.gov.au] |
| 2024–25 |
4.499 (total output cost budget)* |
— |
Victoria Police Annual Report 2024–25 (“total output cost budget of $4.499 b”); Corporate Plan page rounds this to $4.51 b in narrative (“received $4.51 b to fund our 2024–25 budget”) [police.vic.gov.au], [police.vic.gov.au] |
| 2025–26 |
4.51 (budget allocation) |
— |
Corporate Plan 2025–26 (“received $4.51 b from the Victorian Government to fund our 2025–26 budget”) [police.vic.gov.au] |
* Two official sources present the 2024–25 figure slightly differently due to rounding: the Annual Report cites $4.499 b; the Corporate Plan.
Since 2020, police budgets have severely constrained VicPol’s ability to provide the services Victoria needs.
Over that period, the average inflation rate applicable to the Budgets is 3.61%.
When you add the inflation shortfall of $124 m and the savings from not maintaining a fully staffed Police service of $463 m, the Budget allocation for 2026 should have been circa $6 m.
Average inflation rate, 2020–2026
Using the seven annual values:
| Year |
Inflation (%) |
| 2020 |
0.84 |
| 2021 |
2.86 |
| 2022 |
6.59 |
| 2023 |
5.60 |
| 2024 |
3.16 |
| 2025 |
2.40 |
| 2026 |
3.80 |
Calculated average:
Average = 3.61%
These figures are worth looking at because they show clearly that the Force has been underfunded or deliberately defunded each year since about 2020. By a significant amount, aggravated by the estimated additional 648k increase in the States’ population. This population number does not include Temporary or Student Visa holders.
Increasing the population increases crime and disorder, so it is no wonder Police in this State are feeling the impact of underfunding over an extended period with no apparent relief on the horizon. Insufficient funding to attract police in sufficient numbers, the frustrations of the poor, unfit for purpose, IT tech the Force relies on, adds very much to the frustration, causing the exit of many experienced police, skills that cannot be easily replaced.
It is no wonder Police are leaving in droves when they are required to fill out multiple forms, repeating the same data entry multiple times just because they used their discretion to warn somebody, and the computer system integration is either non-existent or an abysmal and embarrassing failure.
Just one example that frustrates the community, which translates into a lack of intel on crime. A victim contacts the Police Advice Line 131444 and provides their details to the operator, who may see fit to transfer the call to 000. There, the operator starts again from the beginning with basic details of the complainant. All the while, the victim has to bide their time while an inefficient system cannot even get the basics right. Bad luck if the victim is hanging on by their fingernails, and the likelihood of that person ringing again to get help is dramatically reduced.
The government must apply some of the savings it is reaping to fix the very embarrassing Force IT shemozzle.
Although only one step to fixing the Force issues, it is a major one, and the savings realised must be applied in part to rectifying and making the Force fit for purpose.
A 1970s-designed system that is expected (and fails) to perform adequately in the 2026 police environment is totally unacceptable.
When reality strikes, as it currently is, with the escalating crime rates, the community will demand a proper Police response to their needs for safety.
To do that, the Force is not 1500 down but more likely 4000 thousand below what the strength should be to deliver an effective service.
The irony is that the cost of crime to the community has become so outrageously high (most of it hidden), an effective and properly resourced Police Force will save money.
A Force capable of preventing crime, a hypothetical police on every corner, will save the State and the community millions.
Preventing crime has a flow-on effect, reducing demand on Courts, Jails, Support services and other Emergency services. Education is more effective and even the pressure on Health Services will be lower.
Spending more in the right places reduces budget impacts, not increasing them.
Police in this State are being defunded by stealth, and the community pays.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE
by CAA | Mar 17, 2026 | Library, Uncategorized
Authorities shocked to discover criminals had better service delivery
Authorities confirmed this week that they have shut down an illegal police station operating in a suburban garage for nearly eight months.
According to stunned investigators, the rogue station had been functioning so efficiently that residents only became suspicious when officers there actually answered the phone, arrived at crime scenes, and filled out paperwork on the same day.
“This immediately raised red flags,” said a spokesperson for the South African Police Service (SAPS). “Real police stations simply don’t operate like that.”
“We thought it was legit”
Local residents say they had no idea the station was fake. In fact, many praised the service.
“They helped me open a case in under ten minutes,” said one resident. “They even gave me a case number and followed up the next day. Looking back, that should have been the first clue something was wrong.”
Another resident said the officers politely asked for statements, offered advice, and did not once suggest that the printer was broken or that the detective was ‘on lunch’ for the sixth hour in a row.
“That level of efficiency was suspicious,” he admitted.
The shocking discovery
The illegal station was eventually uncovered after a senior officer visited the premises and noticed several irregularities:
The building had working computers
Officers answered questions clearly
The kettle in the break room was not the most important piece of equipment in the building
“These things simply do not match official SAPS operating procedures,” said investigators.
Authorities also became suspicious when officers at the station reportedly solved three cases in a single week, a pace analysts described as “reckless and unrealistic.”
Suspects arrested
The group running the operation has been arrested and charged with impersonating police officers, providing competent public service, and creating unrealistic expectations among citizens.
Police confirmed the suspects were not hardened criminals but former security guards, two retired detectives, and a man who once binge-watched an entire season of crime documentaries.
Officials say the group will also face charges for making the real police look bad.
Community reaction
Residents expressed disappointment after the closure.
“To be honest, it was the safest we’ve felt in years,” said a shop owner. “They even walked around the neighbourhood at night.”
One pensioner added:
“They caught the guy who stole my washing line clips. I didn’t even know that was a solvable crime.”
Government response
Officials reassured the public that law enforcement remains committed to maintaining the proper standards of inefficiency expected at legitimate police stations.
“We cannot allow unregulated law enforcement to operate,” the spokesperson said. “If people start thinking crimes can be solved quickly, it could destabilise the entire system.”
Authorities confirmed that residents seeking assistance should now report crimes to the nearest official police station run by the South African Police Service, where the traditional process of waiting, returning tomorrow, and being told the detective is currently ‘in a meeting’ will resume as normal.
Meanwhile, investigators say they are searching for two more suspected illegal police stations, believed to be operating somewhere in the country after reports that stolen bicycles were returned within 48 hours.
“This kind of behaviour cannot be allowed to spread,” officials warned.
‘’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’
Satire Disclaimer: “This satire piece was widely circulated online; original author unknown.”
This article is a work of satire intended purely for humour and commentary. It is not factual reporting and should not be interpreted as real news. Any resemblance to actual events, institutions, or service delivery experiences is purely coincidental… or just part of the joke.
The Community Advocacy Alliance (CAA) is funded by the members and the generous donations from the public. Please consider donating to help us continue to work for you. Simply click on the button below. Thank you – your generosity is very much appreciated.

DONATE