The CAA applauds the belated ban on edged weapons (Machetes) and, like every other Victorian, demands that the ban be immediate.

There is no plausible excuse for a delay.

That a ban was not in place a long time ago beggars’ belief; however, the belated action that will take nine months before coming into effect is absolutely ridiculous; just what are the government planners thinking?

Haven’t they worked it out? It is not the weapon that is the problem. It is the idiot holding onto it.

If they seriously think that the perpetrators who use these weapons are going to show good community responsibility and put their prized weapons and symbols of power into a bin, the government planners are delusional.

For goodness’ sake, these weapons are status symbols that will disappear under their bed, not in a government bin.

And they will be replaced by Mum’s stainless-steel carver.

The Government needs to realise that banning the products altogether will only develop black market trading in the items, playing into the current black market (organised crime) marketing strategy – identify what the market wants, and if it is illegal, go for it.

This strategy works for the crooks, creating unintended consequences, as happened with tobacco. The weapons will probably be sold under the counter from the same shops.

The solution is banning the carrying of edged weapons of every description and giving the Police additional powers to search and seize, supported by mandated penalties to force the anthropomorphic magistracy, where coincidently many of our society ills are created because of their ineptitude, to undertake their role to keep us safe.

It’s not the weapon but the environment where it is located.

Mum’s stainless-steel carver could be the weapon a person is charged with possessing.

At 2.00 am, with a group of mates, the carver is as lethal as a machete and attracts the same status.

If care is not taken, the kitchen arsenal will replace the machete, and we will be no better off. The blades may be shorter, but the victim is just as dead.

It is not anti-social to own an edged weapon, but as soon as it is carried in a public place, the rules change; it’s not the weapon; it is the intended use, intimidation, attack or defence that is the issue.

When the planners grasp that concept, then they might come up with an effective solution like reviewing current legislation and, where necessary, tweaking it to provide the Police with the capacity to properly address the issue rather than being hamstrung by nice restrictive policies sponsored by the socialist elite.

Starting to think of the Police operational necessities (where the rubber hits the road) may go a long way to solving this issue.

Viewing this matter through a political prism will be the downfall of any efforts to curb unnecessary deaths and intimidation.