Victoria’s New Chief Commissioner, Mike Bush, has announced a major restructure of Victoria Police in an effort to make inroads into the burgeoning crime rates.

Although we may not know the full extent of this restructure, what has been reported is extremely good news.

Good news for those of us who favour effective policing based on the community’s needs.

The CAA has advocated these changes for over a decade, through the tenure of five Chief Commissioners who couldn’t or didn’t want to witness the flawed process of ineffective Reactive policing.

Coupled with their lack of leadership skills, the current crime imbroglio was inevitable.

The legacy left behind is that a number of Police officers who were promoted under the flawed reactive model will have difficulty adjusting to the new and modern policing methodology.

They should seriously consider their future and perhaps step aside.

For those who won’t accept the change and take the honourable option, Chief Commissioner Bush has no other choice but to take decisive action to prevent these members from tainting the Police workforce as they adopt this critical change.

The broad principles of freeing up desk-bound police to bolster the proactive function of the force are long overdue.

Similarly, reducing a top-heavy structure that has, for years, consumed both resources and hindered decision-making, drawing decisions up to the hierarchy, far removed from the issue, has effectively diminished the Force’s effectiveness rather than enhancing it.

Solutions to challenges by successive Chiefs Commissioners have led to the creation of more bureaucracies, resulting in more Police being promoted to executive roles and their staff being drawn from the frontline.

The vision by Bush is laudable, focusing on reducing crime before it happens is not a soft option, as some Police hardheads will argue. Their views on reactive (lock ’em up) policing as the way to curb crime have been a failure over the last decade, and it is refreshing to talk about a renaissance of good policing.

It is reported that the Force is facing a mass exodus, which may turn out to be a blessing for the Force and the State.

Some serving members eyeing retirement to escape the fundamentally flawed Police strategy of the last decade may be persuaded to change their minds upon seeing the new direction. Hopefully, many of the hardheads will exit rather than try to adapt to the proactive model.

That would be a significant win for Policing in this state, as many of the ranked members are entrenched in the reactive model and were promoted on this basis.

Their future promotion or retention looks bleak.

The announcement that former or retired Police officers will be offered positions to relieve operational members of administrative duties is not only very sensible but also highly desirable for the benefit of the Force and the Community.

As many of these former members served the Force when it was focused on prevention, they will be an excellent role model to convert sceptical members who have never had that experience.

There are many ex-members who are not so old but resigned for family reasons. Now, as their families grow older, they may relish a return to the Policing fold to restart their careers, given that many of them served before the Force became reactive.

This recruiting cohort could provide the Force with the numbers boost needed to strengthen the proactive model implementation.

The key will be the flexibility and attractiveness of the employment offer.

We hope that this new direction includes a proper Police In Schools Program, which supports Secondary Schools from which most of our juvenile cohort emerge. Not only will this divert many from crime, but it will also create fertile ground for recruiting young people to pursue relevant studies that will equip them to join the Force after leaving school.

We also hope that the Blue Light Disco project is reinvigorated to provide direct interaction between youth and Police aimed at developing long-term positive influences with our youth.

To round out this particular trilogy, the Force needs to take a fresh look at Operation New-Start, designed to keep children in school and off the streets.

Recently published figures on school attendance are abysmal, likely due to schools simply sending problematic children home. Hence, the contribution by this cohort of bored children to the crime epidemic.

Probably a product of the Super School concept, where young people are lost in the system, the only way to improve the situation is to make the necessary legislative adjustments so these children can find employment.

If school doesn’t work for them, joining the workforce at a young age will equip them with life skills for the future, rather than sitting around wasting their life and being drawn to crime.

The current VCAL option is education-focused rather than career-focused and fails troubled kids.

Idle hands are the devil’s workshop.

By adopting this strategy, the net benefit to the State would be immeasurable as opposed to the impact of them committing crimes.

Each of these projects works well in isolation but are highly successful when worked as a trilogy.

This strategy will be far more effective and cheaper than the much-vaunted boot camp concept.