VALUES & WHAT WE CHOOSE TO STAND FOR

 CAA Comment:

 This article, reprinted with kind permission from Heston Russell, the founder of the Australian Values Party, is a must-read for every Australian who cares about their country, our culture and our values. There is also sage advice on how the Police should go about recruiting.

 

What happened in Bondi was an act of terror and mass murder. Innocent people were killed while going about their lives, and families and a community have been shattered.

Moments like this rightly stop a nation – but they also test us.

In 2021, I raised the Australian Values Party for a simple reason:
Values are the bedrock of culture, society, and social cohesion.
Without shared values, laws become hollow, debate becomes tribal, and unity fractures.

Australia relies not only on laws, but on morals and ethics – the standards that shape how laws are written, interpreted, and enforced.

During my time in the Special Forces, when I was responsible for running the Commando Selection Course, we selected people almost entirely on values. Skills could be trained. Fitness could be built. Tactics could be taught.
But values – integrity, responsibility, respect for others, self-discipline, and accountability – had to already be there.

Get the values right, and together you can train the right people, build the right culture, and achieve extraordinary outcomes.

Values define identity.

Many Australians may not know this, but the Department of Home Affairs already has an Australian Values Statement – and it is not symbolic.

Every person entering Australia on a temporary visa, and every applicant progressing through to permanent residency, is required as a literal part of their visa processing to read, sign, and agree to this Values Statement.

Ironically, many people born here have never seen it.

The Australian Government’s Values Statement includes a commitment to:

  • Respect for the freedom and dignity of the individual.
  • Freedom of religion, including the freedom not to follow a particular religion.
  • Freedom of speech and freedom of association.
  • Commitment to the rule of law – that all people are subject to the law & should obey it.
  • Parliamentary democracy.
  • Equality of opportunity for all people, regardless of gender, age, disability, race, sexual orientation, or national or ethnic origin.
  • A “fair go”, embracing mutual respect, tolerance, compassion for those in need, and equality of opportunity.
  • Recognition of the English language as the national language and a unifying element of Australian society.

These values already exist. They are agreed to.
But they are not enshrined, visible, or enforced in the way they should be.

The United States has a Bill of Rights. Religions have commandments.
Australia already has its values – and I believe they should be:

  • Enshrined in law;
  • Displayed in government buildings and public institutions;
  • Used as the moral and ethical charter against which laws, decisions, and actions are measured; and
  • Form a clear basis for accountability – including removal or deportation where those values are fundamentally rejected or violated.

These values are not about religion or ideology.
They cut across religion, culture, and background. They are about people and purpose – not prophets or politics.

They include freedom of religion – but not before commitment to the rule of law, and respect for the freedom and dignity of the individual.

What we are seeing now – politicians fumbling for words, grasping at policy responses, defaulting to symbolic gestures or rushed fixes – is what happens when leaders are not anchored in clear, shared values. Many likely don’t even know these values already exist.

Agreed values must be known, communicated, understood, accepted – and enforced.

Tragedies like Bondi also expose bias – particularly political bias. It hasn’t taken long to see people using this moment to attack.

To be clear: I don’t care much for Anthony Albanese at all.
But pretending that any Prime Minister is personally responsible for every failure across years of policy, bureaucracy, intelligence, policing, and licensing decisions is a bit of a stretch. His failures in leadership, however, are not.

If we are serious about preventing this from happening again, then we need to examine the entire chain – honestly and without fear.

That means asking how:

  • An individual could be placed on a terrorism watch-list in 2019;
  • Yet remain within the system without effective intervention;
  • And how, despite that, a direct family member – his Father – could later be granted a firearms licence.

Those questions matter because risk does not exist in isolation.

Accountability doesn’t stop at the front counter.
It runs through agencies, information-sharing, assessment frameworks, leadership, oversight, and ultimately all the way up.

Before rushing to impose broad new restrictions on millions of law-abiding Australians, we should first identify where the system failed, who made those decisions, and why – and then hold those responsible properly to account.

Anything less is politics, not leadership.

Finally, a word of caution.

In the aftermath of violence, vultures appear – in media, in politics and online. Trauma becomes a tool. Fear becomes currency. Division becomes profitable.

We owe the victims and their families more than noise.
We owe them clarity, responsibility, and courage.

That starts – and ends – with values.

Sincerely,

Heston